• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病照护患者评估(PACIC)调查问卷西班牙语翻译的验证

Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey.

作者信息

Aragones Abraham, Schaefer Eric W, Stevens David, Gourevitch Marc N, Glasgow Russell E, Shah Nirav R

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 423 E 23rd St-15N, New York, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Oct;5(4):A113. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

PMID:18793501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2578783/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey is a patient-centered instrument for evaluating the quality and patient-centeredness of chronic illness care received according to the Chronic Care Model paradigm. This study validates the Spanish translation of the PACIC in an urban, Spanish-speaking population.

METHODS

One hundred Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes completed the translated PACIC and sociodemographic and cultural questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subset of 20 patients who completed the questionnaire 2 to 4 months later. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach alpha. PACIC score and subscale associations with sociodemographic characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability for the overall translated PACIC scale was 0.77. Scores were not associated with patient sociodemographic characteristics, including age, country of birth, years living in the United States, or education level (P >.05).

CONCLUSION

The Spanish translation of the PACIC survey demonstrated high reliability, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Scores showed no association with sociodemographic or cultural characteristics. The Spanish version can reliably be used to assess care delivered according to the Chronic Care Model in a heterogeneous Spanish-speaking population.

摘要

引言

慢性病护理患者评估(PACIC)调查是一种以患者为中心的工具,用于根据慢性病护理模型范式评估所接受的慢性病护理的质量和以患者为中心的程度。本研究在讲西班牙语的城市人群中验证了PACIC的西班牙语翻译版本。

方法

100名讲西班牙语的糖尿病患者完成了翻译后的PACIC以及社会人口统计学和文化调查问卷。在20名患者的子集中评估重测信度,这些患者在2至4个月后完成了问卷。用Cronbach α评估内部一致性。检查PACIC得分及子量表与社会人口统计学特征的关联。

结果

翻译后的PACIC量表总体重测信度为0.77。得分与患者的社会人口统计学特征无关,包括年龄、出生国家、在美国居住的年数或教育水平(P>.05)。

结论

PACIC调查的西班牙语翻译版本显示出高信度、内部一致性和重测信度。得分与社会人口统计学或文化特征无关。西班牙语版本可可靠地用于评估在讲西班牙语的异质人群中根据慢性病护理模型提供的护理。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey.慢性病照护患者评估(PACIC)调查问卷西班牙语翻译的验证
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Oct;5(4):A113. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
2
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
3
Patients' assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.患者对慢性病护理的评估:芬兰2型糖尿病患者的一项验证性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
4
Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in United States community pharmacies.美国社区药店中慢性病护理的患者评估的适应和验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07697-w.
5
Translation and validation of the PACIC+ questionnaire: the Thai version.PACIC+问卷的翻译与验证:泰语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0801-y.
6
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)的开发与验证
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
7
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions.患者评估慢性疾病护理量表的心理测量特性:英国长期疾病患者的可接受性、信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 31;12:293. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-293.
8
Validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) short form scale in heart transplant recipients: the international cross-sectional bright study.心脏移植受者慢性病照顾患者评估(PACIC)简短量表的验证:国际横断面光明研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 3;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5003-3.
9
[Assessment of a Chilean Spanish version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire].[智利西班牙语版慢性病照护问卷患者评估情况]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Jul;145(7):869-878. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000700869.
10
Reliability and validity of the Greek translation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care + (PACIC-PLUS GR) survey.希腊语翻译的患者评估慢性病护理+(PACIC-PLUS-GR)调查的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01192-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes.跨文化调适与验证伊朗 2 型糖尿病老年患者使用慢性疾病关怀患者评估问卷(PACIC-5As)波斯语版
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11557-0.
2
Patient Assessment of Care with Chronic Cardiovascular Disorders and Its Relationship with Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.慢性心血管疾病患者的护理评估及其与自我效能的关系:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;11(15):2189. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152189.
3
Evaluation of Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Multimorbid Patients Using PACIC+ Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study.采用 PACIC+问卷评估多病共存患者对医疗保健服务的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):276. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020276.
4
Validation and the Reliability of the ACIC Questionnaire in the Primary Health Care Setting: a Study from Bosnia and Herzegovina.在初级医疗保健环境中验证和可靠性的 ACIC 问卷:来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的一项研究。
Acta Med Acad. 2022 Dec;51(3):181-188. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.387. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Improving Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes in Latinx Patients: Protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Involving Community Health Workers, Registered Nurses, and Family Members.改善拉丁裔2型糖尿病患者的自我管理:一项涉及社区卫生工作者、注册护士和家庭成员的序贯多分配随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 16;12:e44793. doi: 10.2196/44793.
6
Assessment of the Perception of People Living With HIV Regarding the Quality of Outpatient Care at a Reference Facility in the Federal District, Brazil.对巴西联邦区一家参考机构中艾滋病毒感染者对门诊护理质量的认知评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 20;12:740383. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.740383. eCollection 2021.
7
Psychometric evaluation of patient assessment of chronic illness care among Korean cancer survivors.韩国癌症幸存者慢性病照顾患者评估量表的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256119. eCollection 2021.
8
Type 2 diabetes: patient assessment of chronic illness care.2型糖尿病:慢性病照护的患者评估
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Jan 14;20(1):7-13. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00540-1. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Factors Influencing Healthcare Experience of Patients with Self-Declared Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study in the Basque Country.影响自我诊断糖尿病患者医疗体验的因素:一项基于人群的巴斯克地区横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;9(5):509. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050509.
10
Medical assistant health coaching ("MAC") for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol.医学助理健康辅导(“MAC”)在多样化初级保健环境中用于 2 型糖尿病:一项实用、群组随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106164. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Rocky Mountain's success with chronic care model.
Manag Care. 2006 Nov;15(11):38-41.
2
Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention.将慢性病照护模式引入社区:一项多方面糖尿病照护干预随机对照试验的结果
Diabetes Care. 2006 Apr;29(4):811-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1785.
3
Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management.慢性病照护患者评估(PACIC)在糖尿病患者中的应用:与患者特征、照护接受情况及自我管理的关系
Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2655-61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2655.
4
Can a healthcare system be transformed? Lessons from the past decade at the Veterans Health Administration.医疗保健系统能否转型?退伍军人健康管理局过去十年的经验教训。
Healthc Pap. 2005;5(4):56-9. doi: 10.12927/hcpap..17387.
5
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)的开发与验证
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
6
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.美国为成年人提供的医疗保健质量。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
7
Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care.促使医疗保健消费者参与以提高护理质量。
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1 Suppl):I61-70. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301001-00007.
8
Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care.不平等的待遇:应对医疗保健中的种族和民族差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2002 Aug;94(8):666-8.
9
Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement.慢性病护理评估(ACIC):一种衡量质量改进的实用工具。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):791-820. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00049.
10
Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams.改善慢性病护理突破性系列的自我管理方面:在糖尿病和心力衰竭团队中的实施
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Spring;24(2):80-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_04.