• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation and the Reliability of the ACIC Questionnaire in the Primary Health Care Setting: a Study from Bosnia and Herzegovina.在初级医疗保健环境中验证和可靠性的 ACIC 问卷：来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的一项研究。
Acta Med Acad. 2022 Dec;51(3):181-188. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.387. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
Family Physicians' Perceptions of Primary Health Care Use in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Covid-19 Pandemic, a Cross-sectional Study.家庭医生在新冠疫情期间对波黑初级卫生保健使用的看法：一项横断面研究。
Acta Med Acad. 2023 Apr;52(1):13-23. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.397.
3
Assessment of health literacy in the adult population registered to family medicine physicians in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.评估波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那塞族共和国家庭医学医生注册的成年人口的健康素养。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):32-38. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1571579.
4
Construct validity of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10) in a sample of health professionals in family medicine in Bosnia and Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那家庭医学领域健康专业人员样本中感知压力量表（PSS - 10）的结构效度。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Jul 23;6:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100413. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Reliability and validity of a Thai version of assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC).泰国版慢性病照护评估量表（ACIC）的信效度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1105-13.
6
Smoking behaviour, knowledge and attitudes among Family Medicine physicians and nurses in Bosnia and Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那家庭医学医生和护士的吸烟行为、知识及态度
BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Jun 11;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-12.
7
Family physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines, a survey from the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那斯普斯卡共和国家庭医生对临床指南的看法：一项调查
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Sep;22(3):203-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2016.1170802. Epub 2016 May 11.
8
Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.脊柱侧弯研究学会-22（SRS-22）问卷土耳其语改编版的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2464-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184366.71761.84.
9
Screening of undiagnosed depression among elderly primary care patients: a cross-sectional study from the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.筛查老年初级保健患者未确诊的抑郁症：来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那塞族共和国的横断面研究。
Med Glas (Zenica). 2020 Feb 1;17(1):200-205. doi: 10.17392/1103-20.
10
YFHS-WHO+ Questionnaire: validation of a measure of youth-friendly primary care services.YFHS-WHO+ 问卷：青少年友好型初级保健服务衡量工具的验证。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Nov;51(5):422-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.019. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
[Assessment of a Chilean Spanish version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire].[智利西班牙语版慢性病照护问卷患者评估情况]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Jul;145(7):869-878. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000700869.
2
The primary health care in the emirate of Abu Dhabi: are they aligned with the chronic care model elements?阿布扎比酋长国的初级医疗保健：它们与慢性病护理模式要素相符吗？
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 14;17(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2691-4.
3
Barriers and facilitators for implementation of family medicine-oriented model of primary care in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A qualitative study.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那实施以家庭医学为导向的初级保健模式的障碍与促进因素：一项定性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Jan;33(1):e378-e390. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2470. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
5
Gatekeeping must go beyond the linear referral model.守门制度必须超越线性转诊模式。
BMJ. 2016 Nov 2;355:i5793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5793.
6
Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.慢性病照护模式的有效性：改善医疗实践与健康结局的机遇：一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 10;15:194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8.
7
Validation of the Slovenian version of patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者中斯洛文尼亚语版慢性病照护患者评估量表（PACIC）的验证
Coll Antropol. 2014 Jun;38(2):437-44.
8
Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context.慢性病护理患者评估在法国背景下的适应性与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 19;14:269. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-269.
9
Patients' experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings.患者在教学网络环境下对慢性病护理的体验。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Dec;58(12):1366-73.
10
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护（PACIC）及其简短版（PACIC-S）进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.

在初级医疗保健环境中验证和可靠性的 ACIC 问卷：来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的一项研究。

Validation and the Reliability of the ACIC Questionnaire in the Primary Health Care Setting: a Study from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Institute of Hygiene and Medical Ecology Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Acta Med Acad. 2022 Dec;51(3):181-188. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.387. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

DOI:10.5644/ama2006-124.387
PMID:36799310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10116173/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to carry out the cultural adaptation and validation of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire (ACIC) in the Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

METHODS

A validation study was conducted in two randomly selected primary health care centers in the Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, during March and April 2016. The study participants were all physicians working in family medicine departments during the study. Translation of the ACIC questionnaire version 3.5 was performed following the guidelines of the World Health Organization. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were tested with face validity, construct validity, and internal consistency.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was distributed to 66 family physicians. Missing values were negligible, therefore the criteria for factor analysis were met. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed that the questionnaire measured one factor. The Cronbach alpha coefficient (0.970) showed the excellent level of internal consistency of the questionnaire. The intraclass correlation coefficient (0.802) confirmed the good reliability of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The ACIC questionnaire can be used to assess the quality of chronic care in family medicine practice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further research is needed to explore how changes in healthcare care delivery impact changes in the Chronic Care Model domain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那塞族共和国的慢性疾病关怀评估问卷（ACIC）进行文化调适和验证。

方法

2016 年 3 月至 4 月，在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那塞族共和国的两个随机选定的初级保健中心进行了一项验证研究。研究参与者均为研究期间在家庭医学科工作的医生。ACIC 问卷 3.5 版的翻译是按照世界卫生组织的指导方针进行的。通过表面有效性、结构有效性和内部一致性来测试问卷的有效性和可靠性。

结果

问卷分发给了 66 名家庭医生。缺失值可以忽略不计，因此满足因子分析的标准。探索性因子分析证实该问卷测量了一个因素。问卷的克朗巴赫 α 系数（0.970）显示了其内部一致性的优异水平。内部一致性的组内相关系数（0.802）证实了问卷的可靠性。

结论

ACIC 问卷可用于评估波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那家庭医学实践中的慢性护理质量。需要进一步研究以探讨医疗保健提供方式的变化如何影响慢性照护模式领域的变化。