Buttermann Glenn R, Beaubien Brian P
Midwest Spine Institute, Stillwater, MN, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2134-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d1d7f.
Biomechanical human cadaveric study comparing straight and scoliotic spines with healthy and degenerated L4/5 discs.
To describe the biomechanical environment of discs under various spinal alignments by measuring the coronal intradiscal pressure profiles.
Abnormal loading of the lumbar discs in the concavity of scoliotic curves may accelerate disc degeneration, which may be related to pain.
Eight intact human cadaver spines (T1-S1; mean donor age 47 years old) underwent radiographs, DEXA, and MRI and were graded for disc degeneration. Each specimen was instrumented in a normal (straight coronal) spinal alignment from T4-L4. Intradiscal pressure profiles for the L4/5 disc and resultant moments were obtained under axial follower loads up to 1500 N. Testing was repeated for bilateral 3-cm decompensation. Posterior instrumentation was used to induce scoliosis (thoracic and lumbar curve average = 25 degrees, fractional lumbosacral curve average = 5 degrees), and testing was repeated for all load states.
MRI found 4 healthy (grade I and II) and 4 degenerated (grade III to V) L4/5 discs. Scoliosis and decompensation significantly increased coronal moments (P < 0.003). Disc pressures increased linearly with greater applied loads for all specimens. Healthy L4/5 discs exhibited uniform pressure profiles with normal spinal alignment and minimal effect with simulated scoliosis or decompensation. For degenerated discs, there was a relative pressure profile depression in the nucleus relative to the anulus region; with spinal malalignment, either due to scoliotic curvature, decompensation, or both, there was disc pressure profile asymmetry. The ratio of maximum intradiscal pressure at the concavity relative to the convexity was 1.1 (range, 1.0-1.2) for healthy discs and 3.6 (range, 2.2-4.4) for degenerated discs in the scoliotic specimens (P = 0.008).
Disc pressure profilometry below long spinal constructs found asymmetric loading with the greatest loads at the concave inner anulus, especially in the presence of disc degeneration, scoliosis, and decompensation. For the degenerated cases, there was substantial disc pressure profile asymmetry despite only mildly severe scoliotic curvatures. These results suggest that scoliosis surgeons should minimize end-vertebra tilt, maximize lumbar curve, and balance correction at the time of surgical intervention. These results combined with prior animal studies suggest a compounding effect of asymmetric loading and progression of disc degeneration.
人体尸体生物力学研究,比较健康和退变的L4/5椎间盘的直脊柱和脊柱侧弯。
通过测量冠状位椎间盘内压力分布,描述不同脊柱排列情况下椎间盘的生物力学环境。
脊柱侧弯凹侧腰椎间盘的异常负荷可能加速椎间盘退变,这可能与疼痛有关。
对8具完整的人体尸体脊柱(T1-S1;供体平均年龄47岁)进行X线片、双能X线吸收法(DEXA)和磁共振成像(MRI)检查,并对椎间盘退变进行分级。每个标本在从T4-L4的正常(冠状位直线)脊柱排列下进行器械固定。在高达1500 N的轴向跟随负荷下,获取L4/5椎间盘的椎间盘内压力分布和合成力矩。对双侧3 cm的失代偿情况重复进行测试。使用后路器械诱导脊柱侧弯(胸段和腰段曲线平均 = 25度,腰骶段曲线平均分数 =
5度),并对所有负荷状态重复进行测试。
MRI发现4个健康(I级和II级)和4个退变(III级至V级)的L4/5椎间盘。脊柱侧弯和失代偿显著增加了冠状位力矩(P < 0.003)。所有标本的椎间盘压力均随施加负荷的增加而线性增加。健康的L4/5椎间盘在正常脊柱排列时表现出均匀的压力分布,模拟脊柱侧弯或失代偿时影响最小。对于退变的椎间盘,相对于纤维环区域,髓核存在相对压力分布凹陷;由于脊柱排列不齐,无论是由于脊柱侧弯、失代偿或两者兼有,都会出现椎间盘压力分布不对称。脊柱侧弯标本中健康椎间盘凹侧相对于凸侧的最大椎间盘内压力比值为1.1(范围为1.0-1.2),退变椎间盘为3.6(范围为2.2-4.4)(P = 0.008)。
在长节段脊柱内固定物下方进行椎间盘压力轮廓测量发现,负荷不对称,凹侧内层纤维环承受的负荷最大,尤其是在存在椎间盘退变、脊柱侧弯和失代偿的情况下。对于退变病例,尽管脊柱侧弯程度仅为轻度至中度,仍存在明显的椎间盘压力分布不对称。这些结果表明,脊柱侧弯外科医生在手术干预时应尽量减少终椎倾斜,最大化腰椎前凸,并平衡矫正。这些结果与先前的动物研究相结合,提示不对称负荷和椎间盘退变进展具有复合效应。