Suppr超能文献

在缺乏基于特征的地标信息情况下的视觉归巢

Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information.

作者信息

Gillner Sabine, Weiss Anja M, Mallot Hanspeter A

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Neurobiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):105-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

Abstract

Despite that fact that landmarks play a prominent role in human navigation, experimental evidence on how landmarks are selected and defined by human navigators remains elusive. Indeed, the concept of a 'landmark' is itself not entirely clear. In everyday language, the term landmark refers to salient, distinguishable, and usually nameable objects, rendering the problem of landmark recognition a special case of the general object recognition problem. In contrast, in the insect and robot literature, this notion of landmarks is often replaced by the "local position information" [e.g., Trullier, O., Wiener, S., Berthoz, A., & Meyer, J.-A. (1997). Biologically based artificial navigation systems: Review and prospects. Progress in Neurobiology, 51, 483-544], referring to the entire set of sensor readings obtained at one location. This set may then serve as a characteristic of the particular location. Honey bees have been shown to base place recognition and homing on a snapshot-like memory of the place's visual environment, not on the distances to recognized objects [Cartwright, B., & Collett, T. (1983). Landmark learning in bees. Experiments and models. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 151, 521-543]. A number of theoretical models of snapshot-based homing [e.g., Franz, M., Schölkopf, B., Mallot, H. A., Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching. Biological Cybernetics, 79, 191-202; Vardy, A., & Möller, R. (2005). Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optical flow techniques. Connection Science, 17, 47-89] predict that the accuracy of snapshot-based homing should depend on image contrast. For rodent hippocampal place fields, models have been developed using additional image information such as three-dimensional depth and allocentric orientations (e.g., room axes) and are thus less sensitive to image contrast and noise [e.g. Barry, C., Lever, C., Hayman, R., Hartley, T., Burton, S., O'Keefe, J., et al. (2006). The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 17, 71-79]. Here, we study human visual homing in a virtual environment void of objects and readily detected image features. The environment was a circular room with a homogenous colour gradient covering the wall and uniform floor and ceiling. Subjects were able to approach remembered places. Accuracy decreased with colour gradient modulation and room size, in qualitative agreement with the snapshot model but not with other models of place recognition. We conclude that human memory for places can make use of a snapshot algorithm.

摘要

尽管地标在人类导航中起着重要作用,但关于人类导航者如何选择和定义地标的实验证据仍然难以捉摸。事实上,“地标”的概念本身并不完全清晰。在日常语言中,“地标”一词指的是显著、可区分且通常可命名的物体,这使得地标识别问题成为一般物体识别问题的一个特殊情况。相比之下,在昆虫和机器人文献中,这种地标的概念通常被“局部位置信息”所取代[例如,特鲁利尔,O.,维纳,S.,贝托佐,A.,& 迈耶,J.-A.(1997)。基于生物学的人工导航系统:综述与展望。神经生物学进展,51,483 - 544],指的是在一个位置获得的整套传感器读数。然后这组读数可以作为该特定位置的一个特征。蜜蜂已被证明是基于对某个地方视觉环境的类似快照的记忆来进行地点识别和归巢的,而不是基于到已识别物体的距离[卡特赖特,B.,& 科利特,T.(1983)。蜜蜂的地标学习。实验与模型。比较生理学杂志A,151,521 - 543]。一些基于快照的归巢理论模型[例如,弗兰兹,M.,肖尔科夫,B.,马洛特,H. A.,比尔托夫,H. H.(1998)。我在哪里拍的那张快照?通过图像匹配进行基于场景的归巢。生物控制论,79,191 - 202;瓦尔迪,A.,& 默勒,R.(2005)。基于光流技术的生物学上合理的视觉归巢方法。连接科学,17,47 - 89]预测,基于快照的归巢准确性应该取决于图像对比度。对于啮齿动物海马体位置场,已经开发出使用诸如三维深度和以自我为中心的方向(例如房间轴线)等额外图像信息的模型,因此对图像对比度和噪声不太敏感[例如,巴里,C.,利弗,C.,海曼,R.,哈特利,T.,伯顿,S.,奥基夫,J.,等人(2006)。位置细胞放电和空间记忆的边界向量细胞模型。神经科学综述,17,71 - 79]。在这里,我们在一个没有物体且易于检测图像特征的虚拟环境中研究人类视觉归巢。该环境是一个圆形房间,墙壁、地板和天花板覆盖着均匀的颜色梯度。受试者能够接近记忆中的地点。随着颜色梯度调制和房间大小的变化,准确性降低,这在定性上与快照模型一致,但与其他地点识别模型不一致。我们得出结论,人类对地点的记忆可以利用快照算法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验