• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找归途:人类导航中的地标模糊性

Finding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation.

作者信息

Jetzschke Simon, Ernst Marc O, Froehlich Julia, Boeddeker Norbert

机构信息

Department of Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Bielefeld UniversityBielefeld, Germany.

Cognitive Interaction Technology-Cluster of Excellence, Bielefeld UniversityBielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jul 18;11:132. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00132. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00132
PMID:28769773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5513971/
Abstract

Memories of places often include landmark cues, i.e., information provided by the spatial arrangement of distinct objects with respect to the target location. To study how humans combine landmark information for navigation, we conducted two experiments: To this end, participants were either provided with auditory landmarks while walking in a large sports hall or with visual landmarks while walking on a virtual-reality treadmill setup. We found that participants cannot reliably locate their home position due to ambiguities in the spatial arrangement when only one or two uniform landmarks provide cues with respect to the target. With three visual landmarks that look alike, the task is solved without ambiguity, while audio landmarks need to play three unique sounds for a similar performance. This reduction in ambiguity through integration of landmark information from 1, 2, and 3 landmarks is well modeled using a probabilistic approach based on maximum likelihood estimation. Unlike any deterministic model of human navigation (based e.g., on distance or angle information), this probabilistic model predicted both the precision and accuracy of the human homing performance. To further examine how landmark cues are integrated we introduced systematic conflicts in the visual landmark configuration between training of the home position and tests of the homing performance. The participants integrated the spatial information from each landmark near-optimally to reduce spatial variability. When the conflict becomes big, this integration breaks down and precision is sacrificed for accuracy. That is, participants return again closer to the home position, because they start ignoring the deviant third landmark. Relying on two instead of three landmarks, however, goes along with responses that are scattered over a larger area, thus leading to higher variability. To model the breakdown of integration with increasing conflict, the probabilistic model based on a simple Gaussian distribution used for Experiment 1 needed a slide extension in from of a mixture of Gaussians. All parameters for the Mixture Model were fixed based on the homing performance in the baseline condition which contained a single landmark. from the 1-Landmark Condition. This way we found that the Mixture Model could predict the integration performance and its breakdown with no additional free parameters. Overall these data suggest that humans use similar optimal probabilistic strategies in visual and auditory navigation, integrating landmark information to improve homing precision and balance homing precision with homing accuracy.

摘要

对地点的记忆通常包含地标线索,即由不同物体相对于目标位置的空间排列所提供的信息。为了研究人类如何整合地标信息进行导航,我们进行了两项实验:为此,参与者要么在大型体育馆行走时被提供听觉地标,要么在虚拟现实跑步机装置上行走时被提供视觉地标。我们发现,当只有一个或两个统一的地标相对于目标提供线索时,由于空间排列的模糊性,参与者无法可靠地定位他们的起始位置。有三个看起来相似的视觉地标时,任务能够毫无歧义地解决,而音频地标需要播放三种独特的声音才能有类似的表现。通过整合来自1个、2个和3个地标的地标信息来减少模糊性,这可以使用基于最大似然估计的概率方法很好地建模。与任何人类导航的确定性模型(例如基于距离或角度信息)不同,这个概率模型预测了人类归巢表现的精度和准确性。为了进一步研究地标线索是如何整合的,我们在起始位置训练和归巢表现测试之间的视觉地标配置中引入了系统性冲突。参与者近乎最优地整合了来自每个地标的空间信息,以减少空间变异性。当冲突变得很大时,这种整合就会瓦解,为了准确性而牺牲精度。也就是说参与者再次回到更接近起始位置的地方了,因为他们开始忽略偏离的第三个地标。然而,依靠两个而不是三个地标会导致反应分散在更大的区域,从而导致更高的变异性。为了模拟随着冲突增加整合的瓦解,基于用于实验1的简单高斯分布的概率模型需要在高斯混合模型之前进行扩展。混合模型的所有参数都基于包含单个地标(来自单地标条件)的基线条件下的归巢表现进行固定。通过这种方式,我们发现混合模型可以在没有额外自由参数的情况下预测整合表现及其瓦解。总体而言,这些数据表明人类在视觉和听觉导航中使用类似的最优概率策略,整合地标信息以提高归巢精度,并在归巢精度和归巢准确性之间取得平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/eef08c0a85db/fnbeh-11-00132-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/5555c5deb6cc/fnbeh-11-00132-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/fd077c342f9b/fnbeh-11-00132-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/02bf8a3e116e/fnbeh-11-00132-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/1bae397ae3dc/fnbeh-11-00132-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/9fc13780296b/fnbeh-11-00132-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/eef08c0a85db/fnbeh-11-00132-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/5555c5deb6cc/fnbeh-11-00132-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/fd077c342f9b/fnbeh-11-00132-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/02bf8a3e116e/fnbeh-11-00132-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/1bae397ae3dc/fnbeh-11-00132-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/9fc13780296b/fnbeh-11-00132-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d1/5513971/eef08c0a85db/fnbeh-11-00132-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Finding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation.寻找归途:人类导航中的地标模糊性
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jul 18;11:132. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00132. eCollection 2017.
2
Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation.只见树木,不见森林:人类虚拟导航中路径整合与地标线索的结合
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 May 21;18:1399716. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399716. eCollection 2024.
3
How you get there from here: interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation.你如何从这里到达那里:人类导航中视觉地标与路径整合的相互作用。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):915-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797615574952. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex.后隔区中视觉地标物的表示。
Elife. 2020 Mar 10;9:e51458. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51458.
5
Integration of auditory and visual cues in spatial navigation under normal and impaired viewing conditions.正常和受损视觉条件下空间导航中听觉和视觉线索的整合。
J Vis. 2024 Oct 3;24(11):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.11.7.
6
Interindividual differences influence multisensory processing during spatial navigation.个体间差异会影响空间导航过程中的多感觉加工。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Feb;48(2):174-189. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000973.
7
Did it move? Humans use spatio-temporal landmark permanency efficiently for navigation.它移动了吗?人类有效地利用时空地标永久性进行导航。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):448-463. doi: 10.1037/xge0001279. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Effects of older age on visual and self-motion sensory cue integration in navigation.年龄对导航中视觉和自身运动感觉线索整合的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jun;242(6):1277-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06818-7. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory.视觉地标线索在空间记忆中的整合。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1636-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01581-8. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Local Homing Navigation Based on the Moment Model for Landmark Distribution and Features.基于地标分布和特征的矩模型的局部归巢导航
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 17;17(11):2658. doi: 10.3390/s17112658.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of white noise on spatial navigation of people without visual cues.白噪声对无视觉线索人群空间导航的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03067-8.
2
Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.飞行昆虫的路径整合与光流:当前证据综述
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025 May;211(3):375-401. doi: 10.1007/s00359-025-01734-9. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
3
Integration of auditory and visual cues in spatial navigation under normal and impaired viewing conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias.神经科学需要行为学:纠正简化论偏见。
Neuron. 2017 Feb 8;93(3):480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041.
2
Ontogeny of learning walks and the acquisition of landmark information in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis.沙漠蚁(箭蚁)学习行走的个体发生及地标信息的获取
J Exp Biol. 2016 Oct 1;219(Pt 19):3137-3145. doi: 10.1242/jeb.140459. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
3
How Wasps Acquire and Use Views for Homing.黄蜂如何获取并利用视觉信息进行归巢。
正常和受损视觉条件下空间导航中听觉和视觉线索的整合。
J Vis. 2024 Oct 3;24(11):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.11.7.
4
Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.人类的导航策略及其错误是由空间不确定性的动态相互作用产生的。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 6;15(1):5677. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49722-y.
5
Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation.只见树木,不见森林:人类虚拟导航中路径整合与地标线索的结合
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 May 21;18:1399716. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399716. eCollection 2024.
6
The Virtual Navigation Toolbox: Providing tools for virtual navigation experiments.虚拟导航工具箱:提供虚拟导航实验工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0293536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293536. eCollection 2023.
7
The role of the parahippocampal cortex in landmark-based distance estimation based on the contextual hypothesis.基于语境假设的基于地标距离估计的海马旁回皮层的作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jan;44(1):131-141. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26069. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
8
An adaptive cue selection model of allocentric spatial reorientation.一种基于适应的客体空间再定向线索选择模型。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1409-1429. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000950.
9
Fractal dimension and the navigational information provided by natural scenes.分形维数与自然场景提供的导航信息。
PLoS One. 2018 May 7;13(5):e0196227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196227. eCollection 2018.
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):470-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Going round the bend: Persistent personal biases in walked angles.偏离正轨:行走角度中持续存在的个人偏见。
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar 23;617:72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.视觉与前庭信号的多感官整合在存在移动物体的情况下改善航向辨别能力。
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 7;35(40):13599-607. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2267-15.2015.
6
Optimal cue integration in ants.蚂蚁的最优线索整合
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20151484. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1484.
7
How you get there from here: interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation.你如何从这里到达那里:人类导航中视觉地标与路径整合的相互作用。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):915-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797615574952. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information.自然环境的三维模型与导航信息映射
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Jun;201(6):563-84. doi: 10.1007/s00359-015-1002-y. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
9
Combining sky and earth: desert ants (Melophorus bagoti) show weighted integration of celestial and terrestrial cues.天地结合:沙漠蚂蚁(巴氏美澳蚁)展现出对天体和地面线索的加权整合。
J Exp Biol. 2014 Dec 1;217(Pt 23):4159-66. doi: 10.1242/jeb.107862. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Spatial memory in insect navigation.昆虫导航中的空间记忆。
Curr Biol. 2013 Sep 9;23(17):R789-800. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.020.