Dechering Dirk G, van der Steen Marijke S, Adiyaman Ahmet, Thijs Lutgarde, Deinum Jaap, Li Yan, Dolan Eamon, Akkermans Reinier Pm, Richart Tom, Hansen Tine W, Kikuya Masahiro, Wang Jiguang, O'brien Eoin, Thien Theo, Staessen Jan A
Department of General Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Hypertens. 2008 Oct;26(10):1993-2000. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328309ee4c.
We studied the repeatability of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), which can be computed from 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings as unity minus the regression slope of diastolic on systolic BP.
One hundred and fifty-two hypertensive outpatients recruited in Nijmegen (mean age = 46.2 years; 76.3% with systolic and diastolic hypertension) and 145 patients enrolled in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial (71.0 years) underwent 24-h BP monitoring at a median interval of 8 and 31 days, respectively. We used the repeatability coefficient, which is twice the SD of the within-participant differences between repeat recordings, and expressed it as a percentage of four times the SD of the mean of the paired measurements.
Mean AASI (crude or derived by time-weighted or robust regression) and 24-h pulse pressure (PP) were similar on repeat recordings in both cohorts. In Nijmegen patients, repeatability coefficients of AASI and PP were approximately 50%. In Syst-Eur trial patients, repeatability coefficient was approximately 60% for AASI and approximately 40% for PP. For comparison, repeatability coefficients for 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were approximately 30%. Differences in AASI between paired recordings were correlated with differences in the goodness of fit (r2) of the AASI regression line as well as with differences in the night-to-day BP ratio. However, in sensitivity analyses stratified for type of hypertension, r2, or dipping status, repeatability coefficients for AASI did not widely depart from 50 to 60% range.
Estimates of mean AASI were not different between repeat recordings, and repeatability coefficients were within the 50-60% range.
我们研究了动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)的可重复性,该指数可根据24小时血压(BP)记录计算得出,即1减去舒张压与收缩压的回归斜率。
在奈梅亨招募的152例高血压门诊患者(平均年龄 = 46.2岁;76.3%为收缩期和舒张期高血压患者)和参加欧洲收缩期高血压(Syst-Eur)试验的145例患者(71.0岁)分别接受了24小时血压监测,中位间隔时间分别为8天和31天。我们使用了重复性系数,即重复记录之间参与者内差异标准差的两倍,并将其表示为配对测量均值标准差四倍的百分比。
两个队列重复记录时的平均AASI(原始值或通过时间加权或稳健回归得出的值)和24小时脉压(PP)相似。在奈梅亨患者中,AASI和PP的重复性系数约为50%。在Syst-Eur试验患者中,AASI的重复性系数约为60%,PP的约为40%。相比之下,24小时收缩压和舒张压的重复性系数约为30%。配对记录之间AASI的差异与AASI回归线拟合优度(r2)的差异以及昼夜血压比值的差异相关。然而,在按高血压类型、r2或血压波动状态分层的敏感性分析中,AASI的重复性系数并未大幅偏离50%至60%的范围。
重复记录之间平均AASI的估计值没有差异,重复性系数在50%至60%范围内。