Gavish Benjamin, Ben-Dov Iddo Z, Bursztyn Michael
InterCure Ltd., Lod, Israel.
J Hypertens. 2008 Feb;26(2):199-209. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f25b5a.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) frequently display a linear relationship characterized by the systolic-versus-diastolic slope ('Slope') or the 'ambulatory arterial stiffness index' [AASI = 1 - (diastolic-versus-systolic Slope)] and the correlation coefficient r. We evaluated the effect of using symmetric regression on the AASI and its dependence on clinical characteristics using 24-h ambulatory monitoring.
Ambulatory monitoring data of 140 patients (age 56 +/- 17 years, 45% men) were retrieved from a service database. Slope and the AASI were evaluated using symmetric regression procedures, and the AASI also by standard regression.
Correlation between SBP and DBP was r = 0.74 +/- 0.14 (r > 0.5 in 95% of patients). Low r-values (when SBP correlates poorly with DBP) were tightly linked with nondipping (P < 0.00001). Use of symmetric rather than standard regression eliminated the bias in slope-related parameters and unmasked their dependence on clinical characteristics. Both symmetric Slope and the AASI were independent of mean arterial pressure and r, increased with pulse pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.0001, respectively), with the greater effect of wider pulse pressure in older age (P < 0.005 for both). The symmetric slope was 1.29 +/- 0.28, showing bivariate dependence (r = 0.82) on age (exponential, with P < 0.00001) and pulse pressure dipping (P < 0.00001), increased for antihypertensive drug treatment (0.07 +/- 0.03, P < 0.05) and diabetes mellitus (0.18 +/- 0.06, P < 0.005).
Application of symmetrical regression provides a more valid estimate of the systolic-on-diastolic slope and the AASI, less influenced by goodness of fit and nocturnal dipping and more sensitive to age and disease states such as hypertension and diabetes, thus providing an improved index of arterial stiffening.
收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)常常呈现出一种线性关系,其特征表现为收缩压与舒张压斜率(“斜率”)或“动态动脉僵硬度指数”[AASI = 1 - (舒张压与收缩压斜率)]以及相关系数r。我们使用24小时动态监测评估了对称回归对AASI的影响及其对临床特征的依赖性。
从一个服务数据库中获取了140例患者(年龄56±17岁,45%为男性)的动态监测数据。使用对称回归程序评估斜率和AASI,同时也使用标准回归评估AASI。
SBP与DBP之间的相关性为r = 0.74±0.14(95%的患者r>0.5)。低r值(当SBP与DBP相关性较差时)与非勺型血压密切相关(P<0.00001)。使用对称回归而非标准回归消除了斜率相关参数中的偏差,并揭示了它们对临床特征的依赖性。对称斜率和AASI均独立于平均动脉压和r,随脉压增加(分别为P<0.01和P<0.0001),脉压增宽在老年患者中的影响更大(两者均为P<0.005)。对称斜率为1.29±0.28,显示出对年龄(指数关系,P<0.00001)和脉压勺型变化(P<0.00001)的二元依赖性,在接受降压药物治疗(0.07±0.03,P<0.05)和糖尿病患者中升高(0.18±0.06,P<0.005)。
对称回归的应用为收缩压对舒张压斜率和AASI提供了更有效的估计,受拟合优度和夜间勺型变化的影响较小,对年龄以及高血压和糖尿病等疾病状态更敏感,从而提供了一个更好的动脉僵硬度指标。