Suppr超能文献

健康老年男性和女性的分组运动训练与居家运动训练。一项基于社区的临床试验。

Group- vs home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women. A community-based clinical trial.

作者信息

King A C, Haskell W L, Taylor C B, Kraemer H C, DeBusk R F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, CA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Sep 18;266(11):1535-42.

PMID:1880885
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

--To determine the effectiveness of group- vs home-based exercise training of higher and lower intensities among healthy, sedentary older adults.

DESIGN

--Year-long randomized, controlled trial comparing (1) higher-intensity group-based exercise training; (2) higher-intensity home-based exercise training; (3) lower-intensity home-based exercise training; or (4) assessment-only control.

SETTING

--General community located in northern California.

PARTICIPANTS

--One hundred sixty women and 197 men 50 to 65 years of age who were sedentary and free of cardiovascular disease. One out of nine persons contacted through a community random-digit-dial telephone survey and citywide promotion were randomized.

INTERVENTIONS

--For higher-intensity exercise training, three 40-minute endurance training sessions per week were prescribed at 73% to 88% of peak treadmill heart rate. For lower-intensity exercise training, five 30-minute endurance training sessions per week were prescribed at 60% to 73% of peak treadmill heart rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

--Treadmill exercise test performance, exercise participation rates, and heart disease risk factors.

RESULTS

--Compared with controls, subjects in all three exercise training conditions showed significant improvements in treadmill exercise test performance at 6 and 12 months (P less than .03). Lower-intensity exercise training achieved changes comparable with those of higher-intensity exercise training. Twelve-month exercise adherence rates were better for the two home-based exercise training conditions relative to the group-based exercise training condition (P less than .0005). There were no significant training-induced changes in lipid levels, weight, or blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

--We conclude that (1) this community-based exercise training program improved fitness but not heart disease risk factors among sedentary, healthy older adults; (2) home-based exercise was as effective as group exercise in producing these changes; (3) lower-intensity exercise training was as effective as higher-intensity exercise training in the home setting; and (4) the exercise programs were relatively safe.

摘要

目的

确定在健康、久坐不动的老年人中,高强度和低强度的团体运动训练与居家运动训练的效果。

设计

为期一年的随机对照试验,比较(1)高强度团体运动训练;(2)高强度居家运动训练;(3)低强度居家运动训练;或(4)仅进行评估的对照组。

地点

位于加利福尼亚州北部的普通社区。

参与者

160名女性和197名年龄在50至65岁之间、久坐不动且无心血管疾病的男性。通过社区随机数字拨号电话调查和全市范围宣传联系的九人中,有一人被随机分组。

干预措施

对于高强度运动训练,规定每周进行三次40分钟的耐力训练,强度为跑步机峰值心率的73%至88%。对于低强度运动训练,规定每周进行五次30分钟的耐力训练,强度为跑步机峰值心率的60%至73%。

主要观察指标

跑步机运动测试表现、运动参与率和心脏病风险因素。

结果

与对照组相比,在所有三种运动训练条件下的受试者在6个月和12个月时跑步机运动测试表现均有显著改善(P小于0.03)。低强度运动训练取得的变化与高强度运动训练相当。相对于团体运动训练条件,两种居家运动训练条件下的12个月运动坚持率更高(P小于0.0005)。在血脂水平、体重或血压方面,没有因训练引起的显著变化。

结论

我们得出以下结论:(1)这个基于社区的运动训练项目改善了久坐不动的健康老年人的体能,但未改善心脏病风险因素;(2)居家运动在产生这些变化方面与团体运动一样有效;(3)在居家环境中,低强度运动训练与高强度运动训练一样有效;(4)这些运动项目相对安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验