Jacobs Abigail
CDER/FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Ave Blg 22, Rm 6484, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA.
Toxicol Lett. 2009 Apr 10;186(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
Work in the field "omics" (toxicogenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) has exploded. It is hoped that 'omics' could be a tool for evaluation of general toxicology, reproductive toxicology, the carcinogenicity potential of pharmaceuticals and several other types of toxicity, eventually replacing the use of animals. Although much progress has been made in the standardization of procedures, challenges remain for evaluation of pharmaceuticals for regulatory purposes, because of off-target toxicologic effects, as well as issues of interpretation and the large number of biologic variables that can affect results. Such variables include species/strain, genetic variations, diet, age, dose, duration, and weight of animals. These variables also confound database compilations of expression profiles. The most promising use in the near future would be to clarify pathways for the various types of toxicity and carcinogenicity and get biomarkers for these pathways, to help assess relevance of nonclinical findings to humans.
“组学”领域(毒理基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学)的研究呈爆发式增长。人们希望“组学”能够成为评估一般毒理学、生殖毒理学、药物致癌潜力以及其他几种毒性的工具,最终取代动物实验。尽管在程序标准化方面已经取得了很大进展,但由于脱靶毒理学效应、解释问题以及大量可能影响结果的生物变量,在为监管目的评估药物时仍面临挑战。这些变量包括动物的物种/品系、基因变异、饮食、年龄、剂量、给药持续时间和体重。这些变量也会干扰表达谱数据库的编纂。在不久的将来,最有前景的用途将是阐明各种类型毒性和致癌性的途径,并获得这些途径的生物标志物,以帮助评估非临床研究结果与人类的相关性。