• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“无烟英格兰”政策实施后,西北部一个城镇的吸烟率情况

Smoking prevalence in a north-west town following the introduction of Smoke-free England.

作者信息

Elton P J, Campbell P

机构信息

Bury Primary Care Trust, Unit 3, Elms Square, Whitefield, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Dec;30(4):415-20. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn077. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdn077
PMID:18812435
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In July 2007, legislation banning smoking in public places was introduced in England. This study investigates the impact of this legislation on smoking in Bury.

METHODS

A postal survey was undertaken before the implementation of the legislation. The survey was repeated 3 months after the smoking ban. Smoking prevalence was then compared. Participants were randomly selected using the PCT database of people registered with general practitioners. In the baseline and second survey, 3500 questionnaires were sent to participants. In the baseline survey 59.5% responded. In the second survey 56.3% responded.

RESULTS

Results were standardized to age and gender bands from Bury's population. The baseline survey found that the standardized prevalence of smoking before the ban was 22.4% and after it was 22.6%. The proportion of smokers reporting that on average they smoked 20 cigarettes a day or greater fell from 27.6 to 21.8% (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that in Bury the smoking ban did not have a substantial impact on smoking prevalence but had an impact on the proportion of heavy smokers. The measurement of smoking prevalence before the change in legislation can be used to assess its long-term impact on smoking habits in Bury.

摘要

背景

2007年7月,英国出台了在公共场所禁烟的法律。本研究调查了该法律对伯里地区吸烟情况的影响。

方法

在该法律实施前进行了一次邮寄调查。在禁烟令实施3个月后重复进行了该调查。然后比较吸烟率。使用全科医生注册人员的初级保健信托数据库随机选择参与者。在基线调查和第二次调查中,向参与者发送了3500份问卷。在基线调查中,59.5%的问卷得到回复。在第二次调查中,56.3%的问卷得到回复。

结果

结果根据伯里地区人口的年龄和性别分组进行了标准化。基线调查发现,禁烟前的标准化吸烟率为22.4%,禁烟后为22.6%。报告平均每天吸烟20支及以上的吸烟者比例从27.6%降至21.8%(P = 0.044)。

结论

该研究发现,在伯里地区,禁烟令对吸烟率没有重大影响,但对重度吸烟者的比例有影响。在立法变更前对吸烟率的测量可用于评估其对伯里地区吸烟习惯的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Smoking prevalence in a north-west town following the introduction of Smoke-free England.“无烟英格兰”政策实施后,西北部一个城镇的吸烟率情况
J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Dec;30(4):415-20. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn077. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
2
The effect of smoke-free homes on smoking behavior in the U.S.无烟家庭对美国吸烟行为的影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Sep;35(3):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
3
Social-cognitive beliefs, alcohol, and tobacco use: a prospective community study of change following a ban on smoking in public places.社会认知信念、酒精和烟草使用:一项禁止在公共场所吸烟后的前瞻性社区研究。
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):753-61. doi: 10.1037/a0016943.
4
Public support for anti-smoking legislation varies with smoking status.公众对反吸烟立法的支持因吸烟状况而异。
Aust J Rural Health. 2008 Jul;16(4):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.00959.x.
5
The impact of partial smokefree legislation on health inequalities: evidence from a survey of 1150 pubs in North West England.部分无烟立法对健康不平等的影响:来自对英格兰西北部1150家酒吧调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2005 Sep 1;5:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-91.
6
Short-term impact of new smoke-free legislation on the utilization of a quitline in Hong Kong.香港新的无烟法例对戒烟热线使用情况的短期影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Apr;11(4):356-61. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp025. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
7
Workplace smoking ban policy and smoking behavior.工作场所禁烟政策与吸烟行为。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Sep;42(5):293-7. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.5.293.
8
Study of the impact of laws regulating tobacco consumption on the prevalence of passive smoking in Spain.西班牙关于烟草消费的法律法规对被动吸烟流行率影响的研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):622-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn066. Epub 2008 Aug 2.
9
Impact of the Spanish smoking law in smoker hospitality workers.西班牙吸烟法对从事接待吸烟者工作的员工的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Sep;11(9):1099-106. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp107. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
10
Employees' job satisfaction after the introduction of a total smoke-ban in bars and restaurants in Norway.挪威酒吧和餐厅全面禁烟后员工的工作满意度
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):302-10. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan028. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of the California 1995 smoke-free workplace law on population smoking prevalence using a synthetic control method.使用合成控制法评估1995年加利福尼亚州无烟工作场所法对总体吸烟流行率的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jul 10;19:101164. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101164. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Smoking behaviors before and after implementation of a smoke-free legislation in Guangzhou, China.中国广州实施无烟立法前后的吸烟行为。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 29;15:982. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2353-6.
3
Evaluating effects of statewide smoking regulations on smoking behaviors among participants in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.
评估威斯康星州吸烟法规对《威斯康星州健康调查》参与者吸烟行为的影响。
WMJ. 2012 Aug;111(4):166-71; quiz 172.
4
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟起始、戒烟和流行率的影响:系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Effect of smoke-free legislation on adult smoking behaviour in England in the 18 months following implementation.无烟立法对实施后 18 个月内英格兰成年吸烟行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020933. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws.全面无烟法律是否对健康有益。
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(6):367-78. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-0089-8. Epub 2009 Oct 31.