• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating effects of statewide smoking regulations on smoking behaviors among participants in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.评估威斯康星州吸烟法规对《威斯康星州健康调查》参与者吸烟行为的影响。
WMJ. 2012 Aug;111(4):166-71; quiz 172.
2
Secondhand smoke exposure of children at home and prevalence of parental smoking following implementation of the new tobacco control law in Macao.澳门实施新控烟法后儿童在家中的二手烟暴露情况及家长吸烟率
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.11.018. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
3
Smoking behaviors before and after implementation of a smoke-free legislation in Guangzhou, China.中国广州实施无烟立法前后的吸烟行为。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 29;15:982. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2353-6.
4
Did smokefree legislation in England reduce exposure to secondhand smoke among nonsmoking adults? Cotinine analysis from the Health Survey for England.英国的无烟立法是否降低了不吸烟成年人接触二手烟的水平?来自英格兰健康调查的可替宁分析。
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Mar;120(3):425-30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103680. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
5
The impact of tobacco control policies on disparities in children's secondhand smoke exposure: a comparison of methods.烟草控制政策对儿童二手烟暴露差异的影响:方法比较。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16 Suppl 1:S70-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0996-9.
6
Educational disparities in home smoking bans among households with underage children in the United States: can tobacco control policies help to narrow the gap?美国未成年子女家庭中禁烟令的教育差距:烟草控制政策能否有助于缩小差距?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Dec;15(12):1978-87. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt090. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey.苏格兰实施无烟立法后成年非吸烟者二手烟暴露情况的变化:全国横断面调查
BMJ. 2007 Sep 15;335(7619):549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39315.670208.47. Epub 2007 Sep 9.
8
Smoking restrictions in the home and secondhand smoke exposure among primary schoolchildren before and after introduction of the Scottish smoke-free legislation.家庭吸烟限制和苏格兰无烟立法出台前后小学生二手烟暴露情况。
Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):409-15. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030627. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
Social disparities in parental smoking and young children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from the German KiGGS study between 2003-2006 and 2009-2012.父母吸烟及幼儿在家接触二手烟方面的社会差异:对2003 - 2006年及2009 - 2012年德国KiGGS研究重复横断面数据的时间趋势分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 8;16:485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3175-x.
10
Clearing the Air: Smoke-Free Housing Policies, Smoking, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Affordable Housing Residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015.净化空气:2014 - 2015年明尼苏达州经济适用房居民的无烟住房政策、吸烟与二手烟暴露情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160195.

引用本文的文献

1
The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) Program: An Infrastructure for Advancing Population Health.威斯康星州健康调查(SHOW)项目:推进人群健康的基础设施。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;10:818777. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.818777. eCollection 2022.
2
The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) Program: An infrastructure for Advancing Population Health Sciences.威斯康星州健康调查(SHOW)项目:推进人群健康科学的基础设施。
medRxiv. 2021 Apr 7:2021.03.15.21253478. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.15.21253478.
3
Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.美国无烟法律和政策的不平等获取及其对健康公平性的影响:2000-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1568-1575. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305289. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
4
Is There Any Impact Of The Gutkha Ban on Users and Vendors in Rangareddy District? A Cross Sectional Study.《古特卡禁令对兰加雷迪区使用者和供应商有何影响?一项横断面研究》
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):5005-5009. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.5005.
5
Effects of Enactment of Legislative (Public) Smoking Bans on Voluntary Home Smoking Restrictions: A Review.实施立法(公共场合)禁烟对家庭自愿吸烟限制的影响:一项综述
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):141-148. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw171. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Changes in environmental tobacco smoke exposure: the Beaver Dam experience.环境烟草烟雾暴露的变化:比弗迪尔姆研究经历
WMJ. 2013 Apr;112(2):53-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there an impact of public smoking bans on self-reported smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke?公共场所禁烟令对自我报告的吸烟状况和二手烟暴露有影响吗?
BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 3;11:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-146.
2
The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW), a novel infrastructure for population health research: rationale and methods.威斯康星州健康调查(SHOW),一个用于人群健康研究的新型基础设施:原理和方法。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 23;10:785. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-785.
3
Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.通过立法禁止吸烟以减少二手烟暴露、吸烟率和烟草消费。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14(4):CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2.
4
Comprehensive smoke-free legislation and displacement of smoking into the homes of young children in Hong Kong.香港全面禁烟立法及将吸烟行为转移到儿童家中。
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19(2):129-33. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032003.
5
Smoking restrictions in the home and secondhand smoke exposure among primary schoolchildren before and after introduction of the Scottish smoke-free legislation.家庭吸烟限制和苏格兰无烟立法出台前后小学生二手烟暴露情况。
Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):409-15. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030627. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
6
The control of environmental tobacco smoke: a policy review.环境烟草烟雾控制:政策综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Feb;6(2):741-58. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6020741. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
7
Tobacco control policies are egalitarian: a vulnerabilities perspective on clean indoor air laws, cigarette prices, and tobacco use disparities.烟草控制政策是平等主义的:从弱势群体视角看室内空气清洁法、香烟价格与烟草使用差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(8):1439-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
8
Smoking prevalence in a north-west town following the introduction of Smoke-free England.“无烟英格兰”政策实施后,西北部一个城镇的吸烟率情况
J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Dec;30(4):415-20. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn077. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
9
Smoke-free laws and adult smoking prevalence.无烟法律与成年人吸烟率
Prev Med. 2008 Aug;47(2):206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
10
Implications of a public smoking ban.公共场所禁烟的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;99(1):62-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03403743.

评估威斯康星州吸烟法规对《威斯康星州健康调查》参与者吸烟行为的影响。

Evaluating effects of statewide smoking regulations on smoking behaviors among participants in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.

作者信息

Guzmán Alexis, Walsh Matthew C, Smith Stevens S, Malecki Kristen C, Nieto F Javier

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

出版信息

WMJ. 2012 Aug;111(4):166-71; quiz 172.

PMID:22970531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3529004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that laws banning smoking in public places reduce exposure to secondhand smoke, but the impact of such laws on exposure to smoke outside the home and on household smoking policies has not been well documented. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2009 Wisconsin Act 12, a statewide smoke-free law enacted in July 2010, among participants in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW).

METHODS

Smoking history and demographic information was gathered from 1341 survey participants from 2008 to 2010. Smoking behaviors of independent samples of participants surveyed before and after the legislation was enacted were compared.

RESULTS

The smoking ban was associated with a reduction of participants reporting exposure to smoke outside the home (from 55% to 32%; P<0.0001) and at home (13% to 7%; P=0.002). The new legislation was associated with an increased percentage of participants with no-smoking policies in their households (from 74% to 80%; P=.04). The results were stronger among participants who were older, wealthier, and more educated.

CONCLUSION

Smoke-free legislation appears to reduce secondhand smoke exposure and to increase no-smoking policies in households. Further research should be conducted to see if these effects are maintained.

摘要

背景

研究表明,禁止在公共场所吸烟的法律可减少二手烟暴露,但此类法律对家庭外烟雾暴露及家庭吸烟政策的影响尚无充分记录。本研究的目的是评估2009年威斯康星州第12号法案(一项于2010年7月颁布的全州无烟法律)对威斯康星州健康调查(SHOW)参与者的影响。

方法

收集了2008年至2010年1341名调查参与者的吸烟史和人口统计学信息。比较了立法前后接受调查的参与者独立样本的吸烟行为。

结果

吸烟禁令与报告在家外接触烟雾的参与者减少有关(从55%降至32%;P<0.0001),在家中接触烟雾的参与者也减少(从13%降至7%;P=0.002)。新立法与家庭中实行无烟政策的参与者比例增加有关(从74%增至80%;P=0.04)。在年龄较大、较富裕和受教育程度较高的参与者中,结果更为明显。

结论

无烟立法似乎可减少二手烟暴露,并增加家庭中的无烟政策。应进行进一步研究,以观察这些效果是否得以维持。