Freedenthal Stacey
Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado 80210, USA.
Arch Suicide Res. 2008;12(4):277-98. doi: 10.1080/13811110802324698.
This analysis drew from decades of published research to evaluate the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS), the dominant research tool for assessing intent to die in apparent suicide attempts. The review sought to 1) synthesize findings related to the scale's normative scores, reliability, and validity (factorial, convergent, and predictive), and 2) examine the objective and subjective subscales' performance. A literature search yielded 158 studies reporting findings for the SIS. Psychometric properties were summarized. Studies supported the scale's reliability, especially that of the subscale assessing self-reported (versus circumstantial indicators) of intent. Mixed findings emerged regarding convergent and predictive validity. The review identified shortcomings in factorial validity and the subscales' performance, especially for adolescents. The Suicide Intent Scale has some strengths, but the weaknesses require further investigation into how to better measure intent to die in attempted suicide.
本分析借鉴了数十年已发表的研究成果,以评估自杀意图量表(SIS),这是评估明显自杀未遂中死亡意图的主要研究工具。该综述旨在:1)综合与该量表的常模分数、信度和效度(因子效度、收敛效度和预测效度)相关的研究结果;2)考察客观和主观子量表的表现。文献检索得到了158项报告SIS研究结果的研究。总结了心理测量学特性。研究支持该量表的信度,尤其是评估自我报告(而非间接指标)意图的子量表的信度。关于收敛效度和预测效度,研究结果不一。该综述发现了因子效度和子量表表现方面的不足,尤其是在青少年中。自杀意图量表有一些优点,但这些弱点需要进一步研究如何更好地测量自杀未遂中的死亡意图。