• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平衡顺应性腹腔镜抓钳的设计与评估。

Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper.

机构信息

Department of Biomechanical EngineeringDelft University of Technology 2628 CD Delft The Netherlands.

Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum 3201 GZ Spijkenisse The Netherlands.

出版信息

IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Jul 3;11:451-459. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925
PMID:37817822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10561751/
Abstract

In laparoscopic surgery, quality of haptic feedback is reduced compared to conventional surgery, leading to unintentional tissue damage during grasping. From the perspective of haptics, poor mechanical design of laparoscopic instrument joints induces friction and a nonlinear actuation-tip force relation. In this study, a novel laparoscopic grasper using compliant joints and a magnetic balancer is presented, and the reduction in hysteresis and friction is evaluated. The hysteresis loop of the novel compliant grasper and two conventional laparoscopic graspers (high quality leading commercial brand and low quality unbranded grasper) were measured. In order to assess quality of haptic feedback, the lowest grasper tip load perceivable by instrument users was measured with the novel and the conventional laparoscopic graspers. The hysteresis loop measurement yielded a mechanical efficiency of 43% for the novel grasper, compared to- 25% and 23% for the Aesculap and the unbranded grasper, respectively. The forces perceivable by the user through the novel grasper were significantly lower (mean 1.37N, SD 0.44N) than those of conventional graspers (mean 2.15N, SD 0.71N and mean 2.65N, SD 1.20N, respectively). The balanced compliant grasper technology has the ability to improve the quality of haptic feedback compared to conventional laparoscopic graspers. Research is needed to relate these results to soft and delicate tissue grasping in a clinical setting, for which this instrument is intended.

摘要

在腹腔镜手术中,与传统手术相比,触觉反馈的质量降低了,导致在抓取过程中无意中损伤组织。从触觉的角度来看,腹腔镜器械关节的机械设计不佳会导致摩擦和非线性的执行器-尖端力关系。在这项研究中,提出了一种使用柔顺关节和磁平衡器的新型腹腔镜抓握器,并评估了滞后和摩擦的减少。测量了新型柔顺抓握器和两种传统腹腔镜抓握器(高质量领先商业品牌和低质量无品牌抓握器)的滞后环。为了评估触觉反馈的质量,使用新型和传统腹腔镜抓握器测量了仪器使用者可感知的最低抓握器尖端负载。滞后环测量结果表明,新型抓握器的机械效率为 43%,而 Aesculap 和无品牌抓握器的机械效率分别为 25%和 23%。通过新型抓握器感知到的力明显低于传统抓握器(平均值 1.37N,标准差 0.44N)(平均值 2.15N,标准差 0.71N 和平均值 2.65N,标准差 1.20N,分别)。平衡柔顺抓握器技术有能力提高触觉反馈的质量,与传统腹腔镜抓握器相比。需要进行研究将这些结果与旨在用于软性和精细组织抓取的临床环境联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/66da1f5fb012/klok12-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/0a731b401521/klok1ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/da4ba081c196/klok2-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/3149462206be/klok3ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/4000b9afbf8d/klok4-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/1cce27e6e3ae/klok5-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/2ae9299bc38f/klok6-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/cf564e7252ef/klok7-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/162a89c20cbe/klok8ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/d2f972ec9a58/klok9-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/570b4f99dca7/klok10-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/f30e866d5dcb/klok11-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/66da1f5fb012/klok12-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/0a731b401521/klok1ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/da4ba081c196/klok2-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/3149462206be/klok3ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/4000b9afbf8d/klok4-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/1cce27e6e3ae/klok5-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/2ae9299bc38f/klok6-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/cf564e7252ef/klok7-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/162a89c20cbe/klok8ab-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/d2f972ec9a58/klok9-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/570b4f99dca7/klok10-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/f30e866d5dcb/klok11-3291925.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10561751/66da1f5fb012/klok12-3291925.jpg

相似文献

1
Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper.平衡顺应性腹腔镜抓钳的设计与评估。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Jul 3;11:451-459. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925. eCollection 2023.
2
The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers.增强触觉反馈的腹腔镜抓握器对应用力的影响:与传统抓握器的随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5411-5417. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5623-9. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Performance of a Haptic Feedback Grasper in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Pilot Comparison With Conventional Graspers in a Porcine Model.触觉反馈抓钳在腹腔镜手术中的性能:在猪模型中与传统抓钳的随机对照试验比较
Surg Innov. 2019 Oct;26(5):573-580. doi: 10.1177/1553350619848551. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Force model for laparoscopic graspers: implications for virtual simulator design.腹腔镜抓钳的力模型:对虚拟模拟器设计的启示
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Apr;26(2):97-103. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1252779. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control.腹腔镜抓持器力传递比对抓持控制的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):818-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0107-6. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
6
Factors influencing forces during laparoscopic pinching: Towards the design of virtual simulator.影响腹腔镜夹持力的因素:迈向虚拟模拟器设计。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.078. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
7
Force-adjustable parallel-occlusion grasper.力可调式平行闭锁抓钳
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):750-757. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000911.
8
Output force and ratio of laparoscopic graspers: an evaluation of operating room ergonomics.腹腔镜抓握器的输出力和比:手术室工效学评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):307.e1-307.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 16.
9
Feeling of pulsations in artificial arteries with a real time haptic feedback laparoscopic grasper: a validation study.具有实时触觉反馈的腹腔镜抓钳的人工动脉搏动感:验证研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4222-4228. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10877-w. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
10
Ergonomics of laparoscopic graspers and the importance of haptic feedback: the surgeons' perspective.腹腔镜抓钳的人体工程学及触觉反馈的重要性:外科医生的观点
Gynecol Surg. 2016;13(4):379-384. doi: 10.1007/s10397-016-0959-z. Epub 2016 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Haptic exploration improves performance of a laparoscopic training task.触觉探索提高了腹腔镜训练任务的表现。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4175-4182. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07898-6. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
A new modular mechanism that allows full detachability and cleaning of steerable laparoscopic instruments.一种新的模块化机构,可实现可转向腹腔镜器械的完全可拆卸和清洁。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3484-3493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06849-0. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Force-based learning curve tracking in fundamental laparoscopic skills training.
基于力的学习曲线跟踪在基础腹腔镜技能训练中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3609-3621. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6090-7. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083. Epub 2015 May 6.
5
Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer.开放与封闭箱式训练器中腹腔镜缝合的学习曲线
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4211-0. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌:微创手术的时代演变
BMC Surg. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S12. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹粘连松解术治疗粘连性小肠梗阻的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
8
Indirect measurement of pinch and pull forces at the shaft of laparoscopic graspers.腹腔镜抓握器轴上的捏力和拉力的间接测量。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Mar;50(3):215-21. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0862-3. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
A comparison of evaluation, time pressure, and multitasking as stressors of psychomotor operative performance.评价、时间压力和多重任务作为心理运动操作绩效压力源的比较。
Surgery. 2011 Jun;149(6):776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
10
Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.通过传统剖腹术、标准腹腔镜检查和机器人技术进行子宫内膜癌分期的结果与成本比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.