Petersen Maya L, van der Laan Mark J, Napravnik Sonia, Eron Joseph J, Moore Richard D, Deeks Steven G
Division of Biostatistics, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
AIDS. 2008 Oct 18;22(16):2097-106. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830f97e2.
Current treatment guidelines recommend immediate modification of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals with incomplete viral suppression. These recommendations have not been tested in observational studies or large randomized trials. We evaluated the consequences of delayed modification following virologic failure.
DESIGN/METHODS: We used prospective data from two clinical cohorts to estimate the effect of time until regimen modification following first regimen failure on all-cause mortality. The impact of regimen type was also assessed. As the effect of delayed switching can be confounded if patients with a poor prognosis modify therapy earlier than those with a good prognosis, we used a statistical methodology - marginal structural models - to control for time-dependent confounding.
A total of 982 patients contributed 3414 person-years of follow-up following first regimen failure. Delay until treatment modification was associated with an elevated hazard of all-cause mortality among patients failing a reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen (hazard ratio per additional 3 months delay = 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.08, 1.40), but appeared to have a small protective effect among patients failing a protease inhibitor-based regimen (hazard ratio per additional 3 months delay = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.87, 0.99).
Delay in modification after failure of regimens that do not contain a protease inhibitor is associated with increased mortality. Protease inhibitor-based regimens are less dependent on early versus delayed switching strategies. Efforts should be made to minimize delay until treatment modification in resource-poor regions, where the majority of patients are starting reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens and HIV RNA monitoring may not be available.
当前治疗指南建议,对于病毒抑制不完全的HIV感染者,应立即调整抗逆转录病毒疗法。这些建议尚未在观察性研究或大型随机试验中得到验证。我们评估了病毒学失败后延迟调整治疗的后果。
设计/方法:我们利用两个临床队列的前瞻性数据,估计首次治疗方案失败后至方案调整的时间对全因死亡率的影响。还评估了治疗方案类型的影响。由于如果预后较差的患者比预后较好的患者更早调整治疗,延迟换药的效果可能会受到混淆,因此我们使用了一种统计方法——边际结构模型——来控制时间依赖性混杂因素。
共有982名患者在首次治疗方案失败后进行了3414人年的随访。对于基于逆转录酶抑制剂的治疗方案失败的患者,延迟治疗调整与全因死亡率风险升高相关(每延迟3个月的风险比=1.23,95%置信区间:1.08,1.40),但对于基于蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗方案失败的患者,延迟似乎有较小的保护作用(每延迟3个月的风险比=0.93,95%置信区间:0.87,0.99)。
不含蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗方案失败后延迟调整与死亡率增加相关。基于蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗方案对早期与延迟换药策略的依赖性较小。在资源匮乏地区,应努力尽量减少治疗调整的延迟,在这些地区,大多数患者开始使用基于逆转录酶抑制剂的治疗方案,且可能无法进行HIV RNA监测。