Clark D M, Ball S, Pape D
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, U.K.
Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90115-j.
An experiment investigating the hypothesis that trying to suppress a thought will lead to an immediate and/or delayed increase in its occurrence is reported. Normal subjects listened to a taped story and then verbalized their stream of consciousness during two consecutive time periods. During the first period, one group (suppression) were asked not to think about the tape while two other groups (controls) were asked to think about anything or think about anything including the tape. During the second period, all three groups were instructed to think about anything. Results from the first period failed to support the immediate enhancement hypothesis as the suppression group reported less thoughts about the tape than the controls. However, results from the second period supported the delayed (rebound) hypothesis as subjects who had previously suppressed reported more thoughts about the tape than subjects who had not. The theoretical, methodological, and clinical implications of these results are discussed.
本文报告了一项实验,该实验旨在探究试图抑制一种想法是否会导致其出现频率立即和/或延迟增加这一假设。正常受试者听了一段录音故事,然后在两个连续的时间段内口头表达他们的意识流。在第一个时间段,一组(抑制组)被要求不要去想那段录音,而另外两组(对照组)被要求想任何事情或想任何事情,包括那段录音。在第二个时间段,所有三组都被指示去想任何事情。第一个时间段的结果未能支持即时增强假设,因为抑制组报告的关于那段录音的想法比对照组少。然而,第二个时间段的结果支持了延迟(反弹)假设,因为之前进行过抑制的受试者报告的关于那段录音的想法比未进行抑制的受试者更多。文中讨论了这些结果在理论、方法和临床方面的意义。