Stevenson M, Yu J, Hendrie D, Li L-P, Ivers R, Zhou Y, Su S, Norton R
The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):284-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018820.
To increase seat belt restraint use in Guangzhou City, People's Republic of China.
Comparison group pre-test, post-test design.
Guangzhou City.
Interventions to increase the prevalence of seat belt use in high-income countries (enhanced training and enforcement practices along with raising of public awareness) were adapted and implemented in Guangzhou. The prevalence of seat belt use was determined before and after the introduction of the 12-month intervention. Seat belt prevalence was also examined over the same time period in the neighboring city of Nanning, and an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention was undertaken.
Prevalence rates and incremental cost effectiveness ratios.
A 12% increase in seat belt use was observed in Guangzhou over the study period, increasing from a prevalence of 50% before (error range 30-62%) to 62% after (error range 60-67%) (p<0.001) the intervention; an absolute change difference between the intervention and reference city of 20% was achieved. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the intervention was yen 3246 (US dollars 418) per disability-adjusted life year saved.
This city-wide intervention demonstrates that it is possible to increase the prevalence of seat belt use using similar methods to those used in high-income countries and, importantly, that such an approach is cost-effective.
提高中华人民共和国广州市安全带的使用率。
对照组前测、后测设计。
广州市。
采用并实施了在高收入国家提高安全带使用率的干预措施(加强培训与执法,并提高公众意识)。在为期12个月的干预措施实施前后分别测定安全带使用率。同时,对相邻城市南宁市同期的安全带使用率进行了调查,并对该干预措施进行了增量成本效益分析。
使用率和增量成本效益比。
在研究期间,广州市安全带使用率提高了12%,从干预前的50%(误差范围30%-62%)增至干预后的62%(误差范围60%-67%)(p<0.001);干预组与参照城市的绝对变化差异达到20%。该干预措施的增量成本效益比为每挽救一个伤残调整生命年3246日元(418美元)。
这项全市范围的干预措施表明,采用与高收入国家类似的方法能够提高安全带使用率,而且重要的是,这种方法具有成本效益。