Dargel Jens, Schmidt-Wiethoff Rüdiger, Fischer Sören, Mader Konrad, Koebke Jürgen, Schneider Thomas
Institute II for Anatomy, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse 9, Cologne 50931, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Mar;17(3):220-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0639-2. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
Correct placement of the tibial and femoral bone tunnel is prerequisite to a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study compares the resulting radiographic femoral bone tunnel position of two commonly used techniques for arthroscopically assisted drilling of the femoral bone tunnel: the transtibial approach or drilling through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal. The resulting bone tunnel position was assessed in postoperative knee radiographs of 70 patients after ACL reconstruction. Three independent observers identified the femoral bone tunnel and determined its position in the lateral and A-P view. Differences in femoral tunnel position between transtibial and anteromedial drilling were evaluated. In the sagittal plane, significantly more femoral bone tunnels were positioned close to the reference value using an anteromedial drilling technique (86%) when compared to transtibial drilling (57%). Drilling through the transtibial tunnel resulted in a significantly more anterior position of the femoral tunnel. In the frontal plane, femoral bone tunnels which were placed through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal displayed a significantly greater angulation towards the lateral condylar cortex (50.92 degrees ) when compared to transtibial drilling (58.82 degrees ). In conclusion, drilling the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal results in a radiographic femoral bone tunnel position which is suggested to allow stabilization of both anterior tibial translation and rotational instability when using a single bundle reconstruction technique. Further studies may evaluate if there are any clinical advantages using the anteromedial portal technique.
正确放置胫骨和股骨骨隧道是前交叉韧带(ACL)重建成功的前提条件。本研究比较了两种常用的关节镜辅助股骨骨隧道钻孔技术所产生的股骨骨隧道在影像学上的位置:经胫骨入路或通过前内侧关节镜入口钻孔。在70例ACL重建术后患者的膝关节X线片中评估所产生的骨隧道位置。三名独立观察者确定股骨骨隧道并在侧位和前后位视图中确定其位置。评估经胫骨钻孔和前内侧钻孔之间股骨隧道位置的差异。在矢状面上,与经胫骨钻孔(57%)相比,使用前内侧钻孔技术时,显著更多的股骨骨隧道位置接近参考值(86%)。经胫骨隧道钻孔导致股骨隧道位置明显更靠前。在冠状面上,与经胫骨钻孔(58.82度)相比,通过前内侧关节镜入口放置的股骨骨隧道向外侧髁皮质的成角明显更大(50.92度)。总之,通过前内侧关节镜入口钻股骨隧道会产生一种影像学上的股骨骨隧道位置,当使用单束重建技术时,该位置建议可稳定胫骨前移和旋转不稳。进一步的研究可评估使用前内侧入口技术是否有任何临床优势。