Collins Carmel T, Makrides Maria, Gillis Jennifer, McPhee Andrew J
Child Nutrition Research Centre, Women's and Children's Health Research Institute, Flinders Medical Centre and Women's and Children's Hospital, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, 5042.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD005252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005252.pub2.
Preterm infants start milk feeds by gavage tube. As they mature, sucking feeds are gradually introduced. Women who choose to breast feed their preterm infant are not always available and an alternative approach to feeding is needed. Most commonly, milk (expressed breast milk or formula) is given by bottle. There is some controversy about whether using bottles during the establishment of breast feeds is detrimental to breastfeeding success.
To determine the effect of avoidance of bottle feeds during the establishment of breastfeeding on the likelihood of successful breastfeeding and to determine if alternatives to bottle feeds are safe.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE in any language. The search was updated in July 2008.
Randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials comparing avoidance of bottles with use of bottles in women who have chosen to breast feed their preterm infant.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. When appropriate, we contacted study authors for additional information. Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used.
Five trials of 543 infants were included. Four trials used a cup feeding strategy and one trial used a tube feeding strategy when supplements to breast feeds were needed. The single study of tube feeding had a high risk of bias. In the analysis of all five trials, significant heterogeneity was evident in two of the primary outcomes. This was reduced when the tube feeding trial was removed from analyses.Cup feeding significantly decreased 'no breastfeeding or only partial breast feeding' on discharge home (summary RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91). However, cup feeding significantly increased length of hospital stay by 10 days (95% CI 3.87 to 16.29). There was a high degree of noncompliance in the largest study of cup feeding indicating dissatisfaction with this method by staff and/or parents.The one trial of a tube alone approach significantly reduced 'no breastfeeding or only partial breastfeeding' and 'no breastfeeding at all' at all time periods but the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Supplementing breast feeds by cup confers no breastfeeding benefit beyond discharge home and delays discharge considerably. There is currently insufficient evidence on which to base recommendations for a tube alone approach to supplementing breast feeds. Further research is needed to evaluate a tube alone approach.
早产儿通过胃管开始喂奶。随着他们逐渐成熟,开始逐渐引入吸吮式喂养。选择母乳喂养早产儿的母亲并非总是有空,因此需要一种替代喂养方法。最常见的是用奶瓶喂母乳(挤出的母乳或配方奶)。在建立母乳喂养期间使用奶瓶是否会对母乳喂养的成功产生不利影响存在一些争议。
确定在建立母乳喂养期间避免奶瓶喂养对成功母乳喂养可能性的影响,并确定奶瓶喂养的替代方法是否安全。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE,不限语言。检索于2008年7月更新。
比较选择母乳喂养早产儿的母亲中避免使用奶瓶与使用奶瓶的随机或半随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。适当时,我们联系研究作者获取更多信息。采用Cochrane协作网和Cochrane新生儿综述组的标准方法。
纳入了涉及543名婴儿的5项试验。4项试验采用杯喂策略,1项试验在需要补充母乳喂养时采用管喂策略。关于管喂的单项研究存在较高的偏倚风险。在对所有5项试验的分析中,两项主要结局存在明显的异质性。当管喂试验从分析中剔除时,这种异质性降低了。杯喂显著降低了出院时“未进行母乳喂养或仅部分母乳喂养”的情况(汇总RR 0.75,95%CI 0.61至0.91)。然而,杯喂显著使住院时间延长了10天(95%CI 3.87至16.29)。在最大的杯喂研究中存在高度的不依从性,表明工作人员和/或家长对这种方法不满意。关于仅采用管喂方法的单项试验在所有时间段均显著降低了‘未进行母乳喂养或仅部分母乳喂养’以及‘完全未进行母乳喂养’的情况,但由于偏倚风险较高,结果需要谨慎解读。
通过杯喂补充母乳喂养在出院后并无母乳喂养益处,且会显著延迟出院。目前尚无足够证据为仅采用管喂方法补充母乳喂养提供建议依据。需要进一步研究来评估仅采用管喂的方法。