McKinney Christy M, Glass Robin P, Coffey Patricia, Rue Tessa, Vaughn Matthew G, Cunningham Michael
Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Box 357475, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Aug;20(8):1620-33. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1961-9.
Objective WHO and UNICEF recommend cup feeding for neonates unable to breastfeed in low-resource settings. In developed countries, cup feeding in lieu of bottle feeding in the neonatal period is hypothesized to improve breastfeeding outcomes for those initially unable to breastfeed. Our aim was to synthesize the entire body of evidence on cup feeding. Methods We searched domestic and international databases for original research. Our search criteria required original data on cup feeding in neonates published in English between January 1990 and December 2014. Results We identified 28 original research papers. Ten were randomized clinical trials, 7 non-randomized intervention studies, and 11 observational studies; 11 were conducted in developing country. Outcomes evaluated included physiologic stability, safety, intake, duration, spillage, weight gain, any and exclusive breastfeeding, length of hospital stay, compliance, and acceptability. Cup feeding appears to be safe though intake may be less and spillage greater relative to bottle or tube feeding. Overall, slightly higher proportions of cup fed versus bottle fed infants report any breastfeeding; a greater proportion of cup fed infants reported exclusive breastfeeding at discharge and beyond. Cup feeding increases breastfeeding in subgroups (e.g. those who intend to breastfeed or women who had a Caesarean section). Compliance and acceptability is problematic in certain settings. Conclusions Further research on long-term breastfeeding outcomes and in low-resource settings would be helpful. Research data on high risk infants (e.g. those with cleft palates) would be informative. Innovative cup feeding approaches to minimize spillage, optimize compliance, and increase breastfeeding feeding are needed.
目的 世界卫生组织和联合国儿童基金会建议在资源匮乏地区,对无法进行母乳喂养的新生儿采用杯子喂养。在发达国家,新生儿期用杯子喂养代替奶瓶喂养被认为可以改善那些最初无法进行母乳喂养的婴儿的母乳喂养结局。我们的目的是综合关于杯子喂养的全部证据。方法 我们检索了国内外数据库中的原始研究。检索标准要求为1990年1月至2014年12月间以英文发表的关于新生儿杯子喂养的原始数据。结果 我们识别出28篇原始研究论文。其中10篇为随机临床试验,7篇为非随机干预研究,11篇为观察性研究;11篇在发展中国家开展。评估的结局包括生理稳定性、安全性、摄入量、持续时间、溢出情况、体重增加、任何形式的母乳喂养和纯母乳喂养、住院时间、依从性和可接受性。杯子喂养似乎是安全的,尽管相对于奶瓶或管饲喂养,摄入量可能较少且溢出情况较多。总体而言,与奶瓶喂养的婴儿相比,杯子喂养的婴儿中报告进行任何形式母乳喂养的比例略高;杯子喂养的婴儿中在出院时及之后进行纯母乳喂养的比例更高。杯子喂养在亚组中(例如那些打算进行母乳喂养的婴儿或剖宫产的女性)增加了母乳喂养率。在某些情况下,依从性和可接受性存在问题。结论 对长期母乳喂养结局以及在资源匮乏地区开展进一步研究将有所帮助。关于高危婴儿(例如腭裂婴儿)的研究数据将提供有用信息。需要创新的杯子喂养方法以尽量减少溢出、优化依从性并增加母乳喂养率。