Suppr超能文献

[使用NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄的超声乳化临床研究]

[Clinical study of phacoemulsification with NeoSoniX handpiece].

作者信息

Ye Ying-jia, Wang Yong, Tang Liang, Shi Ming-hua, Yang Jie, Yu Chang-tai

机构信息

Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, Wuhan 430063, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;44(4):306-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of phacoemulsification with NeoSoniX handpiece.

METHODS

It was a prospective random controlled clinical trial. Six hundred and fifty-nine cases (659 eyes) having phacoemulsification were prospectively comprised in this study. All cases were divided into two groups randomly. Group 1(NeoSoniX handpiece) include 317 cases. Group 2 (standard handpiece) include 342 cases. Preoperative measurements included best correct visual acuity (BCVA) and cataract grade according to the Emery classification. Intraoperative measurements included active power (AP) and effective phaco time (EPT). Postoperative measurements included BCVA and corneal edema.

RESULTS

Grade I to III nuclear sclerosis, the AP was 3.53% +/- 1.76% with NeoSoniX and 3.84% +/- 1.93 % with standard handpiece, the EPT was (0.23 +/- 0.15) minutes and (0.25 +/- 0.19) minutes, respectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative BCVA and cornea edema between the two groups. Grade IV or V nuclear sclerosis, the AP was 6.31% +/- 2.78 % with NeoSoniX and 9.45% +/- 4.17 % with standard handpiece, the EPT was (0.55 +/- 0.28) minutes and (0.83 +/- 0.44) minutes, respectively. There was significant difference in the postoperative 1 day BCVA and cornea edema between the two groups. There was significant difference in the postoperative 7 days BCVA and cornea edema between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound energy consumption with NeoSoniX was significantly less than with US alone in emulsifying cataracts of optimum density and dense hard cataracts.

摘要

目的

评估使用NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄的手术效果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。本研究前瞻性纳入了659例(659只眼)接受超声乳化手术的患者。所有病例随机分为两组。第1组(NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄组)317例,第2组(标准超声乳化手柄组)342例。术前测量包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和根据埃默里分类法的白内障分级。术中测量包括有效功率(AP)和有效超声乳化时间(EPT)。术后测量包括BCVA和角膜水肿。

结果

I至III级核硬化,使用NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄时AP为3.53%±1.76%,使用标准超声乳化手柄时为3.84%±1.93%,EPT分别为(0.23±0.15)分钟和(0.25±0.19)分钟。两组术后BCVA和角膜水肿无显著差异。IV或V级核硬化,使用NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄时AP为6.31%±2.78%,使用标准超声乳化手柄时为9.45%±4.17%,EPT分别为(0.55±0.28)分钟和(0.83±0.44)分钟。两组术后1天的BCVA和角膜水肿有显著差异。两组术后7天的BCVA和角膜水肿有显著差异。

结论

在乳化密度适中的白内障和致密硬核白内障时,使用NeoSoniX超声乳化手柄的超声能量消耗显著低于单纯使用超声。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验