Suppr超能文献

保护分诊只是明智的决策吗?

Is conservation triage just smart decision making?

作者信息

Bottrill Madeleine C, Joseph Liana N, Carwardine Josie, Bode Michael, Cook Carly, Game Edward T, Grantham Hedley, Kark Salit, Linke Simon, McDonald-Madden Eve, Pressey Robert L, Walker Susan, Wilson Kerrie A, Possingham Hugh P

机构信息

The University of Queensland, The Applied Environmental Decision Analysis Centre, The Ecology Centre, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Dec;23(12):649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

Abstract

Conservation efforts and emergency medicine face comparable problems: how to use scarce resources wisely to conserve valuable assets. In both fields, the process of prioritising actions is known as triage. Although often used implicitly by conservation managers, scientists and policymakers, triage has been misinterpreted as the process of simply deciding which assets (e.g. species, habitats) will not receive investment. As a consequence, triage is sometimes associated with a defeatist conservation ethic. However, triage is no more than the efficient allocation of conservation resources and we risk wasting scarce resources if we do not follow its basic principles.

摘要

保护工作和急诊医学面临着类似的问题

如何明智地利用稀缺资源来保护宝贵资产。在这两个领域,确定行动优先级的过程被称为分类。尽管保护管理人员、科学家和政策制定者常常在无形中使用分类,但它被误解为只是决定哪些资产(如物种、栖息地)将不会获得投资的过程。因此,分类有时与一种失败主义的保护伦理相关联。然而,分类不过是对保护资源的有效分配,如果我们不遵循其基本原则,就有浪费稀缺资源的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验