Milano Julie, Rossato Mateus F, Oliveira Sara M, Drewes Carine, Machado Pablo, Beck Paulo, Zanatta Nilo, Martins Marcos A P, Mello Carlos F, Rubin Maribel A, Ferreira Juliano, Bonacorso Helio G
Laboratório de Neurotoxicidade e Psicofarmacologia, Departamento de Química, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, UFSM, Camobi, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Life Sci. 2008 Nov 21;83(21-22):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of the novel pyrazoline methyl ester: 4-methyl-5-trifluoromethyl-5-hydroxy-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole methyl ester (MPF4).
The effect of MPF4 was assessed in two models of pain: arthritic pain caused by Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) and postoperative pain caused by surgical incision in mice.
MPF4 given intraperitoneally (1.0 mmol/kg, i.p.) produced marked antinociception in inflammatory allodynia caused by CFA. The antinociceptive effect produced by MPF4 was reversed with the pre-treatment of animals with naloxone or naltrindole. Oral administration of MPF4 (1.0 mmol/kg, p.o), dipyrone (1.0 mmol/kg, p.o.) and morphine (0.026 mmol/kg, p.o.) also produced an anti-allodynic effect. However, none of the compounds evaluated reversed the paw edema produced by CFA. Moreover, MPF4, dipyrone and morphine also produced an anti-allodynic effect in the surgical incisional pain model. The maximal inhibitions obtained with preemptive drug treatment were 66+/-7%, 73+/-9% and 88+/-8% for MPF4 (1.0 mmol/kg, p.o.), dipyrone (1.0 mmol/kg, p.o.) and morphine (0.026 mmol/kg, p.o.), respectively. The maximal inhibitions obtained with curative drug treatment were 53+/-9%, 83+/-7% and 84+/-7%, for MPF4, dipyrone and morphine, respectively. Unlike indomethacin, MPF4 did not induce gastric lesions at the dose that caused the highest antinociception (1.0 mmol/kg, p.o). The anti-allodynic action of MPF4, dipyrone and morphine was not associated with impairment of motor activity.
The results of the present study suggest that MPF4 represents a potential target for the development of new drugs to treat persistent inflammatory pain.
本研究旨在评估新型吡唑啉甲酯:4-甲基-5-三氟甲基-5-羟基-4,5-二氢-1H-吡唑甲酯(MPF4)的抗伤害感受作用。
在两种疼痛模型中评估MPF4的作用:完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)引起的关节炎疼痛和小鼠手术切口引起的术后疼痛。
腹腔注射MPF4(1.0 mmol/kg,腹腔注射)对CFA引起的炎性痛觉过敏产生显著的抗伤害感受作用。用纳洛酮或纳曲吲哚预处理动物可逆转MPF4产生的抗伤害感受作用。口服MPF4(1.0 mmol/kg,口服)、安乃近(1.0 mmol/kg,口服)和吗啡(0.026 mmol/kg,口服)也产生抗痛觉过敏作用。然而,所评估的化合物均未逆转CFA引起的爪部水肿。此外,MPF4、安乃近和吗啡在手术切口疼痛模型中也产生抗痛觉过敏作用。MPF4(1.0 mmol/kg,口服)、安乃近(1.0 mmol/kg,口服)和吗啡(0.026 mmol/kg,口服)预先给药治疗获得的最大抑制率分别为66±7%、73±9%和88±8%。MPF4、安乃近和吗啡治疗给药获得的最大抑制率分别为53±9%、83±7%和84±7%。与吲哚美辛不同,MPF4在引起最高抗伤害感受作用的剂量(1.0 mmol/kg,口服)下不会诱导胃部病变。MPF4、安乃近和吗啡的抗痛觉过敏作用与运动活动受损无关。
本研究结果表明,MPF4是开发治疗持续性炎性疼痛新药的潜在靶点。