Pearce Alan J, Kidgell Dawson J, Zois James, Carlson John S
Centre for Ageing, Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Jan;105(2):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0887-3. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
Evidence suggests that static stretching inhibits muscular power. However, research does not reflect practice whereby individuals follow up stretching with secondary activity. This study investigated muscular power following stretching, and after a second bout of activity. Participants (n = 13) completed 3 randomized testing sessions which included a 5 min warm-up, followed by a vertical jump (VJ) on a force platform; an intervention (static stretching, dynamic, or control), followed by a second VJ. Participants then completed a series of movements, followed by a VJ, up to 60 min post activity. Immediately following the intervention, there was a 10.7% difference in VJ between static and dynamic stretching. The second warm up bout increased VJ height following the dynamic intervention, whereas the static stretching condition did not show any differences. The novel finding from this study demonstrates a second exercise bout does not reverse the effects of static stretching and is still detrimental to VJ.
有证据表明，静态拉伸会抑制肌肉力量。然而，研究并未反映出个体在拉伸后进行二次活动的实际情况。本研究调查了拉伸后以及第二轮活动后的肌肉力量。参与者（n = 13）完成了3次随机测试环节，包括5分钟的热身，随后在测力平台上进行垂直纵跳（VJ）；进行一项干预（静态拉伸、动态拉伸或对照），之后再进行一次VJ。参与者随后完成一系列动作，之后进行VJ，直至活动后60分钟。干预后立即测量发现，静态拉伸和动态拉伸后的VJ存在10.7%的差异。第二次热身环节使动态干预后的VJ高度增加，而静态拉伸组则未显示出任何差异。本研究的新发现表明，第二轮运动并不能逆转静态拉伸的影响，且仍然对VJ有不利影响。
