Colbert Colleen Y, Ownby Allison R, Butler Patricia M
Office of Educational Programs, University of Texas Medical School-Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):340-5. doi: 10.1080/10401330802384912.
Portfolios, often described as collections of evidence, are discussed as a means of teaching or assessing the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies. Yet, it is unclear how many residency programs utilize portfolios. The purpose of this article is to (a) review the literature on portfolio use in graduate medical education; (b) examine efficacy of portfolio use, based upon studies in the field; and (c) offer a discussion of considerations for implementing portfolios.
Two searches of PubMed, OVID, JSTOR, SCOPUS, and FirstSearch Wilson Select were conducted between October 2006 and April 2007 to identify studies and articles related to portfolio usage. Thirty-nine articles met criteria and were reviewed.
There is wide variation in how portfolios are utilized within U.S. residency programs. The challenge for graduate medical education is to create consensus on the definition and purpose of portfolios, such that best practices in portfolio implementation and assessment can be achieved.
档案袋，通常被描述为证据集合，被作为一种教授或评估毕业后医学教育认证委员会能力的手段进行讨论。然而，尚不清楚有多少住院医师培训项目使用档案袋。本文的目的是：（a）回顾关于毕业后医学教育中档案袋使用的文献；（b）根据该领域的研究检验档案袋使用的有效性；（c）对实施档案袋的相关考量进行讨论。
在2006年10月至2007年4月期间，对PubMed、OVID、JSTOR、SCOPUS和FirstSearch Wilson Select进行了两次检索，以识别与档案袋使用相关的研究和文章。39篇文章符合标准并进行了审查。
美国住院医师培训项目在档案袋的使用方式上存在很大差异。毕业后医学教育面临的挑战是就档案袋的定义和目的达成共识，以便实现档案袋实施和评估的最佳实践。
