Suppr超能文献

使用尼德克OPD-Scan动态视网膜检影仪和蔡司WASCA哈特曼-夏克像差仪测量高阶像差的比较。

Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.

作者信息

Cerviño Alejandro, Hosking Sarah L, Montés-Micó Robert

机构信息

Dept of Optics, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;24(8):790-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20081001-04.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the measurement of wavefront aberrations in non-cyclopleged human eyes with Hartmann-Shack and dynamic skiascopy wavefront analyzers.

METHODS

Eighty eyes of 40 healthy young adults (19 men, 21 women; mean age 20.8 +/- 2.5 years) with refractive errors ranging from +1.50 to -9.75 diopters (D) sphere and up to 1.75 D cylinder (mean spherical equivalent refraction -2.12 +/- 2.69 D) were examined with the Zeiss/Meditec WASCA and NIDEK OPD-Scan wavefront analyzers and with the Nippon SRW5000 binocular, open-field autorefractor without the instillation of antimuscarinic agents. Three measurements were taken with each system, in randomized sequence. To avoid differences due to instrument myopia, eyes were excluded if mean spherical equivalent refraction with any of the analyzers exceeded those obtained with the SRW5000 by more than 1.00 D; 13 eyes were excluded. Coefficient of repeatability was determined for the WASCA as the confidence interval (CI) for the differences between the repeated measures. Paired t tests with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman plots of difference versus mean were performed.

RESULTS

The coefficient of repeatability for the WASCA ranged from 0.008 to 0.022 microm. Data distribution was normal for all Zernike coefficients measured with WASCA, but only for Z(3)(-1), Z(3)(1), and Z(4)(0) measured with the OPD-Scan. Mean differences between instruments in coefficients Z(3)(-3), Z(3)(1), Z(3)(3), Z(4)(0), and Z(4)(2) and higher order root-mean-square (RMS) reached statistical significance (mean difference +/- CI: -0.054 +/- 0.021, -0.056 +/- 0.022, and 0.030 +/- 0.016 microm, respectively, P < .05 in all cases). Correlation coefficients were significant only for higher order RMS (Spearman's rho = 0.777; P > .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although agreement is shown for higher order RMS, aberration values obtained with dynamic skiascopy and Hartmann-Shack systems on non-cyclopleged human eyes are not well correlated with each other, and are therefore not interchangeable.

摘要

目的

比较使用哈特曼-夏克和动态检影波前分析仪在未散瞳人眼中测量波前像差的情况。

方法

对40名健康年轻成年人(19名男性,21名女性;平均年龄20.8±2.5岁)的80只眼睛进行检查,这些眼睛的球镜屈光不正范围为+1.50至-9.75屈光度(D),柱镜度数最高达1.75 D(平均等效球镜屈光不正-2.12±2.69 D)。使用蔡司/美狄泰克WASCA和尼德克OPD-Scan波前分析仪以及日本SRW5000双目、开放视野自动验光仪进行检查,不滴用抗胆碱能药物。每个系统按随机顺序进行三次测量。为避免因器械性近视导致的差异,如果任何分析仪测得的平均等效球镜屈光不正超过SRW5000测得的值超过1.00 D,则将眼睛排除;共排除13只眼睛。将WASCA的重复性系数确定为重复测量之间差异的置信区间(CI)。进行了带有Bonferroni校正的多重比较配对t检验、相关性分析以及差异与平均值的Bland-Altman图分析。

结果

WASCA的重复性系数范围为0.008至0.022微米。用WASCA测量的所有泽尼克系数的数据分布均呈正态分布,但用OPD-Scan测量时仅Z(3)(-1)、Z(3)(1)和Z(4)(0)呈正态分布。仪器之间在系数Z(3)(-3)、Z(3)(1)、Z(3)(3)、Z(4)(0)和Z(4)(2)以及高阶均方根(RMS)上的平均差异达到统计学显著性(平均差异±CI:分别为-0.054±0.021、-0.056±0.022和0.030±0.016微米,所有情况P<0.05)。相关性系数仅在高阶RMS时具有显著性(Spearman秩相关系数rho = 0.777;P>.001)。

结论

尽管高阶RMS显示出一致性,但在未散瞳人眼中使用动态检影和哈特曼-夏克系统获得的像差值彼此之间相关性不佳,因此不可互换。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验