Suppr超能文献

肺癌的姑息治疗与生活质量;临床医生判断治疗结果的能力如何?

Palliation and life quality in lung cancer; how good are clinicians at judging treatment outcome?

作者信息

Regan J, Yarnold J, Jones P W, Cooke N T

机构信息

Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1991 Aug;64(2):396-400. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.316.

Abstract

A recent trial by the MRC Lung Cancer Working Party used physician assessments to compare two palliative schedules of radiotherapy in lung cancer. A prospective study has been undertaken on a subset of these trial patients to see how physician assessments of symptomatic relief and general condition correlate with patient perception of therapeutic response. In 40 patients followed up monthly from presentation until close to death, good agreement was found between doctors and patients on change in specific physical symptoms and overall physical condition. Doctors were poor judges of life quality at presentation but appeared able to identify relative improvement or deterioration in overall quality of life. In conclusion, physician assessments may constitute valid end-points for radiotherapy trials comparing palliative schedules in lung cancer.

摘要

医学研究委员会肺癌工作组最近进行了一项试验,利用医生评估来比较肺癌两种姑息性放疗方案。对这些试验患者的一个子集进行了一项前瞻性研究,以观察医生对症状缓解和总体状况的评估与患者对治疗反应的认知之间的相关性。在40例从就诊开始每月随访直至临近死亡的患者中,医生和患者在特定身体症状的变化和总体身体状况方面达成了良好的一致。医生在就诊时对生活质量的判断较差,但似乎能够识别出总体生活质量的相对改善或恶化。总之,医生评估可能构成比较肺癌姑息性放疗方案的放疗试验的有效终点。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验