Bormann Tobias, Kulke Florian, Wallesch Claus-W, Blanken Gerhard
Department of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics, University of Erfurt, D-99105, Erfurt, Germany.
Brain Lang. 2008 Jan;104(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
Within a discrete two-stage model of lexicalization, semantic errors and errors of omission are assumed to be independent events. In contrast, cascading and interactive models allow for an influence of word form on lexical selection and thus for an inherent relationship in accounting for both error types. A group of 17 aphasic patients was assessed with a naming test controlling for semantic competition of the target items. Semantic errors were more frequent for targets with many competitors than for targets with few competitors while omissions were more frequent when few competitors were available. However, the overall sums of errors in both item groups were comparable. These results imply a common source of both error types and thus speak against a strictly serial model of naming.
在一个离散的两阶段词汇化模型中，语义错误和遗漏错误被假定为独立事件。相比之下，级联模型和交互模型考虑到词形对词汇选择的影响，因此在解释这两种错误类型时存在内在联系。一组17名失语症患者接受了一项命名测试，该测试控制了目标项目的语义竞争。与竞争较少的目标相比，竞争较多的目标出现语义错误的频率更高，而当竞争较少时，遗漏错误的频率更高。然而，两组项目中的错误总数相当。这些结果意味着这两种错误类型有共同的来源，因此反对严格的串行命名模型。
