• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这一切背后隐藏着什么?”——一项关于全科医生对指南使用态度的访谈研究

"What lies beneath it all?"--an interview study of GPs' attitudes to the use of guidelines.

作者信息

Carlsen Benedicte, Norheim Ole F

机构信息

Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 22;8:218. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-218.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-218
PMID:18945360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2577651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) adopt clinical practice guidelines to varying degrees. Several factors have been found to influence application of guidelines in practice and the GP is apparently the key actor. Studies are needed to increase our understanding of how GPs' attitudes influence their use of guidelines. In this study we explored GPs' attitudes to guidelines.

METHODS

In 2007 we conducted six semi-structured group interviews with a purposive sample of 27 Norwegian GPs. The participants were encouraged to discuss guidelines they were familiar with, the evidence base of guidelines, professional autonomy and doctor-patient relations. We used thematic content analysis to extract central themes and arguments.

RESULTS

When deciding whether tfollow guideline recommendations, GPs consider whether guidelines are trustworthy, whether they suit patients and whether the recommended action is feasible. There were two important findings. First, the GP's were concerned that guidelines may be more heavily influenced by economic considerations than clinical ones. Second, in contrast to earlier findings, changes in recommendations and disagreement between experts were mostly viewed positively.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the need for transparency in the process of development and implementation of guidelines. To enhance the use of guidelines, primary care physicians should be involved in the process of developing guidelines and the process should be transparent and explicit regarding the evidence base and economic considerations.

摘要

背景

全科医生(GPs)对临床实践指南的采用程度各不相同。已发现若干因素会影响指南在实践中的应用,而全科医生显然是关键因素。需要开展研究以增进我们对全科医生态度如何影响其对指南使用的理解。在本研究中,我们探讨了全科医生对指南的态度。

方法

2007年,我们对27名挪威全科医生进行了有目的抽样的六次半结构化小组访谈。鼓励参与者讨论他们熟悉的指南、指南的证据基础、职业自主性和医患关系。我们使用主题内容分析法提取核心主题和论据。

结果

在决定是否遵循指南建议时,全科医生会考虑指南是否值得信赖、是否适合患者以及推荐的行动是否可行。有两个重要发现。首先,全科医生担心指南可能受经济因素影响大于临床因素。其次,与早期研究结果相反,建议的变化和专家之间的分歧大多被视为积极的。

结论

本研究强调了指南制定和实施过程中透明度的必要性。为了加强指南的使用,基层医疗医生应参与指南制定过程,并且该过程在证据基础和经济考虑方面应透明且明确。

相似文献

1
"What lies beneath it all?"--an interview study of GPs' attitudes to the use of guidelines.“这一切背后隐藏着什么?”——一项关于全科医生对指南使用态度的访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct 22;8:218. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-218.
2
Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: a qualitative study.影响基于实践的教育干预以支持循证处方的可行性和可接受性的因素:一项定性研究
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):661-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh614. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
3
Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study.沟通不畅可能会损害哮喘的最佳治疗效果:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2007 Feb;24(1):65-70. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml062. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
4
Urinary incontinence in the elderly: attitudes and experiences of general practitioners. A focus group study.老年人尿失禁:全科医生的态度与经历。一项焦点小组研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Mar;24(1):56-61. doi: 10.1080/02813430500417920.
5
[Barriers to evidence-based medicine encountered among GPs - an issue based on misunderstanding? A qualitative study in the general practice setting].[全科医生在循证医学中遇到的障碍——一个基于误解的问题?在全科医疗环境中的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(8-9):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
6
Triggering anti-smoking advice by GPs: mode of action of an intervention stimulating smoking cessation advice by GPs.全科医生触发反吸烟建议:一种刺激全科医生提供戒烟建议的干预措施的作用方式。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.008. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
7
General practitioners' uptake of clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study.全科医生对临床实践指南的采纳情况:一项定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):149-53. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029494.
8
Improving care in depression: qualitative study investigating the effects of using a mental health questionnaire.改善抑郁症护理:一项关于使用心理健康问卷效果的定性研究
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(4):251-61.
9
German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines - a national survey.德国门诊护理医生对临床指南的看法——一项全国性调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Jul 20;7:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-47.
10
Doctor-patient interaction in Finnish primary health care as perceived by first year medical students.芬兰医科大学一年级学生所感知到的芬兰初级卫生保健中的医患互动。
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Sep 15;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding hospital antimicrobial prescribing decisions and determinants of uptake of new local antimicrobial prescribing guidelines in Laos.了解老挝医院抗菌药物处方决策以及新的当地抗菌药物处方指南的采用决定因素。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 12;9:183. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20884.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Documentary analysis of national and international guidance for community clinicians referring patients with suspected chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.对国内外指导社区临床医生转介疑似慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的文献进行分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 20;13(2):e002784. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002784.
3
Building High-Performing Primary Care Systems: After a Decade of Policy Change, Is Canada "Walking the Talk?".建立高绩效的初级保健系统:政策变革十年后,加拿大是否“言行一致”?
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1139-1190. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12674. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
The utility of the classification tools in National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence's Clinical Knowledge Summaries for primary care.美国国立卫生研究院和临床优化研究所基层医疗临床知识总结中的分类工具的效用。
Fam Pract. 2024 Apr 15;41(2):194-197. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad091.
5
Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study.基层医疗与二级或三级医疗环境中进行的随机对照试验的干预效果估计:一项meta 流行病学研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01815-2.
6
Examining drivers of self-harm guideline implementation by general practitioners: A qualitative analysis using the theoretical domains framework.探讨全科医生实施自残行为指南的驱动因素:使用理论领域框架的定性分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Nov;27(4):1275-1295. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12598. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Sources of Information on Medicinal Products Among Physicians - A Survey Conducted Among Primary Care Physicians in Poland.医生获取药品信息的来源——在波兰初级保健医生中开展的一项调查
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 6;12:801845. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.801845. eCollection 2021.
8
Prerequisites for providing effective support to family caregivers within the primary care setting - results of a study series in Germany.在初级保健环境中为家庭护理人员提供有效支持的前提条件-德国一系列研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 22;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01601-x.
9
What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting? : Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany.在初级保健环境中,指南有何意义?:对德国全科医生进行的探索性在线调查结果。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):321-329. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
Pharmaceutical companies information and antibiotic prescription patterns: A follow-up study in Spanish primary care.制药公司信息与抗生素处方模式:西班牙初级保健的后续研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221326. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract.生物医学、整体论与全科医疗实践:对2004年全科医生合同的回应
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Jul;30(5):788-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
2
Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.“应该”与“不应该”:全科医生对临床实践指南态度的元综合分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Dec;57(545):971-8. doi: 10.3399/096016407782604820.
3
Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines' prescribing recommendations in primary care.在石地上摔倒?一项关于基层医疗中临床指南处方建议实施情况的定性研究。
Health Policy. 2008 Feb;85(2):148-61. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
4
Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines.言语至关重要:加强临床指南的实施。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):367-70. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014100.
5
[Guidelines in general practice--are they read and are they used?].[一般实践中的指南——它们有人阅读并被使用吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Feb 3;125(3):300-3.
6
Clinical guidelines of depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views.抑郁症临床指南:对全科医生观点的定性研究
J Fam Pract. 2004 Jul;53(7):556-61.
7
An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing.对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南对全科医生开处方的影响的评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Feb;54(499):103-7.
8
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.指南传播与实施策略的有效性和效率。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta8060.
9
Factors influencing adherence to guidelines in general practice.影响全科医疗中指南依从性的因素。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Summer;19(3):546-54. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000497.
10
Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?美国的初级保健:初级保健守门与转诊:有效过滤器还是失败的试验?
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):692-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.692.