Valenstein Marcia, Kim Hyungjin Myra, Ganoczy Dara, McCarthy John F, Zivin Kara, Austin Karen L, Hoggatt Katherine, Eisenberg Daniel, Piette John D, Blow Frederic C, Olfson Mark
Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113-0170, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
Health systems with limited resources may have the greatest impact on suicide if their prevention efforts target the highest-risk treatment groups during the highest-risk periods. To date, few health systems have carefully segmented their depression treatment populations by level of risk and prioritized prevention efforts on this basis.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 887,859 VA patients receiving depression treatment between 4/1/1999 and 9/30/2004. We calculated suicide rates for five sequential 12-week periods following treatment events that health systems could readily identify: psychiatric hospitalizations, new antidepressant starts (>6 months without fills), "other" antidepressant starts, and dose changes. Using piecewise exponential models, we examined whether rates differed across time-periods. We also examined whether suicide rates differed by age-group in these periods.
Over all time-periods, the suicide rate was 114/100,000 person-years (95% CI; 108, 120). In the first 12-week periods, suicide rates were: 568/100,000 p-y (95% CI; 493, 651) following psychiatric hospitalizations; 210/100,000 p-y (95% CI; 187, 236) following new antidepressant starts; 193/100,000 p-y (95% CI; 167, 222) following other starts; and 154/100,000 p-y (95% CI; 133, 177) following dose changes. Suicide rates remained above the base rate for 48 weeks following hospital discharge and 12 weeks following antidepressant events. Adults aged 61-80 years were at highest risk in the first 12-week periods.
To have the greatest impact on suicide, health systems should prioritize prevention efforts following psychiatric hospitalizations. If resources allow, closer monitoring may also be warranted in the first 12 weeks following antidepressant starts, across all age-groups.
资源有限的卫生系统如果在自杀风险最高的时期将预防工作针对风险最高的治疗群体,可能对自杀产生最大影响。迄今为止,很少有卫生系统根据风险水平对抑郁症治疗人群进行细致划分,并在此基础上对预防工作进行优先排序。
我们对1999年4月1日至2004年9月30日期间接受抑郁症治疗的887,859名退伍军人事务部(VA)患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们计算了卫生系统能够轻易识别的治疗事件后连续五个12周期间的自杀率:精神病住院、开始使用新的抗抑郁药(超过6个月未取药)、“其他”抗抑郁药开始使用以及剂量变化。使用分段指数模型,我们研究了不同时间段的自杀率是否存在差异。我们还研究了这些时间段内不同年龄组的自杀率是否存在差异。
在所有时间段内,自杀率为114/100,000人年(95%置信区间;108, 120)。在最初的12周期间,自杀率分别为:精神病住院后568/100,000人年(95%置信区间;493, 651);开始使用新的抗抑郁药后210/100,000人年(95%置信区间;187, 236);开始使用其他抗抑郁药后193/100,000人年(95%置信区间;167, 222);剂量变化后154/100,000人年(95%置信区间;133, 177)。出院后48周和抗抑郁药事件后12周内,自杀率仍高于基础率。61 - 80岁的成年人在最初的12周期间风险最高。
为了对自杀产生最大影响,卫生系统应优先在精神病住院后开展预防工作。如果资源允许,在所有年龄组开始使用抗抑郁药后的前12周内,也可能需要进行更密切的监测。