Olea-Popelka F J, Fitzgerald P, White P, McGrath G, Collins J D, O'Keeffe J, Kelton D F, Berke O, More S, Martin S W
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Clinical Research Building, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1.
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Mar 1;88(3):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
We investigated the impact of targeted removal of badgers on the subsequent bovine tuberculosis (BTB) risk in cattle herds in county Laois, Ireland. The study period was 1989-2005. For each of 122 targeted badger-removal licenses (permit to remove badgers in the proximity of cattle herds undergoing a serious BTB episode), the herd number (index herd) for which the license was given was obtained. The herds in the proximity of the index herd were identified from another database. The main "exposure" in our study was the geographical location of herds relative to the area in which targeted badger removal was conducted. We categorized herds into five different exposure groups: herds were classified as non-exposed and denoted as group 0 (reference group) if they were located 500 m or more from the edge of any parcel of land of the index herd; group 1, was the index herds, group 2 the immediate (contiguous) neighbors of the index herd, group 3 herds were not immediate neighbors but within 150 m and group 4 herds were between 150 m and 500 m distance from the edge of any parcel of land of the index herd, respectively. We conducted a survival analysis (allowing multiple failures per herd) to compare the hazard of having a BTB episode in any of the four groups of exposed herds vs. the hazard in herds in the reference group. We controlled for other known risk factors as well taking into account a temporal component. Our analysis showed that the hazard ratio for the index herds (group 1) were non-significantly increased, indicating that there was no difference in the hazard of failing a BTB test (after the targeted badger removal was conducted) between index herds and reference herds. For the rest of the herds farther away from badger removal activities the hazards were lower than herds in areas not under badger removal. The hazard in the reference group decreased over the study period.
我们调查了在爱尔兰劳伊斯郡有针对性地捕杀獾对牛群后续感染牛结核病(BTB)风险的影响。研究时间段为1989年至2005年。对于122份有针对性的獾捕杀许可证(允许在经历严重牛结核病疫情的牛群附近捕杀獾)中的每一份,获取了颁发该许可证的牛群编号(索引牛群)。索引牛群附近的牛群从另一个数据库中识别出来。我们研究中的主要“暴露因素”是牛群相对于进行有针对性獾捕杀区域的地理位置。我们将牛群分为五个不同的暴露组:如果牛群距离索引牛群任何一块土地的边缘500米或更远,则被归类为未暴露,记为0组(参照组);1组是索引牛群,2组是索引牛群的直接(相邻)邻居,3组牛群不是直接邻居但在150米范围内,4组牛群距离索引牛群任何一块土地的边缘在150米至500米之间。我们进行了生存分析(允许每个牛群有多次发病情况),以比较四组暴露牛群中任何一组发生牛结核病疫情的风险与参照组牛群的风险。我们还控制了其他已知风险因素,并考虑了时间因素。我们的分析表明,索引牛群(1组)的风险比没有显著增加,这表明在进行有针对性的獾捕杀后,索引牛群和参照牛群在牛结核病检测失败风险方面没有差异。对于其他远离獾捕杀活动的牛群,其风险低于未进行獾捕杀地区的牛群。在研究期间,参照组的风险有所下降。