Gormley Eamonn, Corner Leigh A L
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Dec 21;5:327. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00327. eCollection 2018.
When human health is put at risk from the transmission of animal diseases, the options for intervention often require input from stakeholders whose differing values systems contribute to decisions on disease management. Animal tuberculosis (TB), caused principally by is an archetypical zoonotic pathogen in that it can be transmitted from animals to humans and . Although elimination of zoonotic transmission of TB to humans is frequently promoted as the for TB management in livestock, in many countries the control strategies are more likely based on minimizing the impact of sustained infection on the agricultural industry. Where wild animals are implicated in the epidemiology of the disease, the options for control and eradication can require involvement of additional stakeholder groups. Conflict can arise when different monetary and/or societal values are assigned to the affected animals. This may impose practical and ethical dilemmas for decision makers where one or more species of wild animal is seen by some stakeholders to have a greater value than the affected livestock. Here we assess the role of stakeholder values in influencing TB eradication strategies in a number of countries including Ireland, the UK, the USA, Spain, France, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. What it reveals is that the level of stakeholder involvement increases with the complexity of the epidemiology, and that similar groups of stakeholders may agree to a set of control and eradication measures in one region only to disagree with applying the same measures in another. The level of consensus depends on the considerations of the reservoir status of the infected host, the societal values assigned to each species, the type of interventions proposed, ethical issues raised by culling of sentient wild animals, and the economic cost benefit effectiveness of dealing with the problem in one or more species over a long time frame. While there is a societal benefit from controlling TB, the means to achieve this requires identification and long-term engagement with all key stakeholders in order to reach agreement on ethical frameworks that prioritize and justify control options, particularly where culling of wild animals is concerned.
当人类健康因动物疾病传播而面临风险时,干预措施的选择通常需要利益相关者的参与,他们不同的价值体系会影响疾病管理决策。动物结核病主要由……引起,是一种典型的人畜共患病原体,它可以从动物传播给人类,并且……。虽然消除结核病向人类的人畜共患传播经常被倡导为家畜结核病管理的目标,但在许多国家,控制策略更可能基于尽量减少持续感染对农业产业的影响。当野生动物涉及该疾病的流行病学传播时,控制和根除的选择可能需要其他利益相关者群体的参与。当对受影响动物赋予不同的货币和/或社会价值时,可能会产生冲突。对于决策者来说,当一些利益相关者认为一种或多种野生动物的价值高于受影响的家畜时,这可能会带来实际和伦理困境。在这里,我们评估了利益相关者价值观在影响包括爱尔兰、英国、美国、西班牙、法国、澳大利亚、新西兰和南非在内的多个国家结核病根除策略中的作用。研究结果表明,利益相关者的参与程度随着流行病学复杂性的增加而提高,并且类似的利益相关者群体可能在一个地区同意一套控制和根除措施,而在另一个地区却不同意采用相同的措施。共识程度取决于对受感染宿主储存库状态的考虑、赋予每个物种的社会价值、提议的干预类型、捕杀有感知能力的野生动物所引发的伦理问题,以及在长期内处理一个或多个物种问题的经济成本效益。虽然控制结核病有社会效益,但实现这一目标的手段需要识别并与所有关键利益相关者进行长期接触,以便就优先考虑并证明控制选项合理的伦理框架达成一致,特别是在涉及捕杀野生动物的情况下。