Mallen Christian D, Dunn Kate M, Thomas Elaine, Peat George
Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Center, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
Department of Epidemiology, Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Center, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1296-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
To investigate the effect of font size and paper thickness on the response to, and completion of, a self-completion postal questionnaire among older people with joint pain.
Randomized trial. People aged 50 years and older with joint pain who consulted a general practitioner at one of five general practices in Central Cheshire were sent a postal questionnaire. Questionnaire format (large or small font size, thick or thin paper) was randomly allocated using a 2 x 2 factorial design.
Questionnaires were received from 502 out of 650 participants (crude response 77%). Response was significantly higher for participants receiving questionnaires with a larger font size (79.3% vs. 75.2%; hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.56). Paper thickness had no significant effect on response. Completion (measure by assessing double-page turnover error) was increased in participants receiving questionnaires printed on thicker paper (3.2% vs. 7.1%; P=0.049) but was not affected by font size.
This study demonstrates that questionnaires in larger font and on thicker paper may produce higher and more complete responses than surveys using standard size font and standard thickness paper, and should therefore be considered in studies among older people.
调查字体大小和纸张厚度对关节疼痛老年人自填式邮寄问卷的应答率及问卷完成情况的影响。
随机试验。向在柴郡中部五个普通诊所之一咨询全科医生的50岁及以上关节疼痛患者发送邮寄问卷。问卷格式(大字体或小字体、厚纸张或薄纸张)采用2×2析因设计随机分配。
650名参与者中有502人回复了问卷(粗略应答率77%)。收到大字体问卷的参与者应答率显著更高(79.3%对75.2%;风险比1.26,95%置信区间:1.02,1.56)。纸张厚度对应答率无显著影响。通过评估双页翻转错误衡量的问卷完成情况,在收到用较厚纸张打印问卷的参与者中有所增加(3.2%对7.1%;P=0.049),但不受字体大小影响。
本研究表明,与使用标准字体大小和标准厚度纸张的调查相比,大字体和厚纸张的问卷可能会产生更高且更完整的应答,因此在针对老年人的研究中应予以考虑。