Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e014474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014474.
Despite common assumptions that doctors are well placed to lead hospitals and healthcare organisations, the peer-reviewed literature contains little evidence on the performance of doctors in leadership roles in comparison with that of non-medical managers.
To determine whether there is an association between the leader's medical background and management performance in terms of organisational performance or patient outcomes.
We searched for peer-reviewed, English language studies using Medline, Embase and Emerald Management between 2005 and 2017. We included quantitative, qualitative and mixed method empirical studies on the performance of senior healthcare managers where participants were described as doctors or leaders and where comparative performance data were provided on non-medical leaders. Studies without full text available, or no organisational, leadership behaviour or patient measures, were excluded.
The search, conducted in Medline (n=3395), Embase (n=1913) and Emerald Management (n=454) databases, yielded 3926 entries. After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies remained. Twelve studies found that there were positive differences between medical and non-medical leaders, and eight studies correlated those findings with hospital performance or patient outcomes. Six studies examined the composition of boards of directors; otherwise, there were few common areas of investigation. Five inter-related themes emerged from a narrative analysis: the impact of medical leadership on outcomes; doctors on boards; contribution of qualifications and experience; the medical leader as an individual or part of a team and doctors transitioning into the medical leadership role.
A modest body of evidence supports the importance of including doctors on organisational governing boards. Despite many published articles on the topic of whether hospitals and healthcare organisations perform better when led by doctors, there were few empirical studies that directly compared the performance of medical and non-medical managers. This is an under-researched area that requires further funding and focus.
尽管人们普遍认为医生在领导医院和医疗保健组织方面具有优势,但同行评议文献中几乎没有证据表明医生在领导角色中的表现优于非医疗管理人员。
确定领导者的医学背景与组织绩效或患者结果方面的管理绩效之间是否存在关联。
我们在 2005 年至 2017 年间使用 Medline、Embase 和 Emerald Management 搜索了同行评议的英文研究。我们纳入了关于高级医疗保健管理人员绩效的定量、定性和混合方法实证研究,其中参与者被描述为医生或领导者,并提供了非医疗领导者的比较绩效数据。排除了没有全文或没有组织、领导行为或患者措施的研究。
在 Medline(n=3395)、Embase(n=1913)和 Emerald Management(n=454)数据库中的搜索共产生了 3926 条记录。应用纳入和排除标准后,有 16 项研究仍然存在。12 项研究发现医学和非医学领导者之间存在积极差异,8 项研究将这些发现与医院绩效或患者结果相关联。有 6 项研究检查了董事会的组成;否则,调查的共同领域很少。从叙述性分析中出现了五个相互关联的主题:医疗领导对结果的影响;医生在董事会中的作用;资格和经验的贡献;作为个体或团队一部分的医疗领导者以及医生过渡到医疗领导角色。
有相当数量的证据支持在组织治理委员会中包括医生的重要性。尽管有许多关于医院和医疗保健组织是否由医生领导表现更好的文章,但很少有实证研究直接比较医学和非医学管理人员的绩效。这是一个研究不足的领域,需要进一步的资金和关注。