Schutte Sander, Polling Jan Roelof, van der Helm Frans C T, Simonsz Huib J
Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;247(3):399-409. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0961-x. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
Reoperations are frequently necessary in strabismus surgery. The goal of this study was to analyze human-error related factors that introduce variability in the results of strabismus surgery in a systematic fashion.
We identified the primary factors that influence the outcome of strabismus surgery. For each of the human-error related factors we quantified variation with clinical assessments: measurement of the angle of strabismus, surgical strategy and surgical accuracy. Firstly, six patients were examined by six orthoptists, and accuracy of prism cover tests was assessed. Secondly, a questionnaire with sample cases (10 degrees, 15 degrees and 20 degrees of infantile esotropia) was put to orthoptists, to determine variation in current surgical strategy. Finally, photographs made during surgery were analyzed to assess surgical accuracy. The influence of human-error related factors was related to the influence of inter-patient differences with a mechanical model. The relative contribution of all factors was assessed with a sensitivity analysis, and results were compared to clinical studies.
The surgical trajectory of strabismus surgery could be modeled mathematically. Measurement of angle of strabismus, surgical technique, anatomy and physiology were considered. Variations in the human-error related factors were: (1) the latent angle at distant fixation was measured with a 90% confidence interval of 5 degrees , and comprised 20% of the total variance of the postoperative angle, (2) orthoptists decided for bilateral recessions of, respectively, 7.3 +/- 1.7 mm (total amount of two recessions), 9.1 +/- 1.2 mm and 10.3 +/- 1.3 mm, which comprised 15% of the total variance, and (3) surgical accuracy was estimated at +/-0.5 mm, which comprised 20% of the total variance.
The human error in strabismus surgery could be quantified with a sensitivity analysis. Approximately half of the reoperations in strabismus surgery are caused by inaccuracy in the measurement of the angle of strabismus, variability in surgical strategy and imprecise surgery.
斜视手术中常常需要再次手术。本研究的目的是以系统的方式分析导致斜视手术结果出现差异的人为失误相关因素。
我们确定了影响斜视手术结果的主要因素。对于每个与人为失误相关的因素,我们通过临床评估来量化差异:斜视角度的测量、手术策略和手术准确性。首先,由六位视光师对六名患者进行检查,并评估棱镜遮盖试验的准确性。其次,向视光师发放一份包含样本病例(10度、15度和20度婴儿型内斜视)的问卷,以确定当前手术策略的差异。最后,分析手术过程中拍摄的照片以评估手术准确性。通过一个力学模型将人为失误相关因素的影响与患者间差异的影响联系起来。用敏感性分析评估所有因素的相对贡献,并将结果与临床研究进行比较。
斜视手术的手术轨迹可以用数学方法建模。考虑了斜视角度的测量、手术技术、解剖结构和生理因素。与人为失误相关的因素的差异为:(1)远距离注视时的潜在角度测量,90%置信区间为5度,占术后角度总方差的20%;(2)视光师决定的双侧后徙量分别为(两次后徙总量)7.3±1.7毫米、9.1±1.2毫米和10.3±1.3毫米,占总方差的15%;(3)手术准确性估计为±0.5毫米,占总方差的20%。
斜视手术中的人为失误可以通过敏感性分析进行量化。斜视手术中约一半的再次手术是由斜视角度测量不准确、手术策略的差异和手术不精确导致的。