Suppr超能文献

严重实体脏器损伤患者中简明损伤定级标准与美国创伤外科学会器官损伤分级的不一致性。

Lack of Concordance Between Abbreviated Injury Scale and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale in Patients with High-Grade Solid Organ Injury.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (Santos, Kunz, Grigorian, Alvarez, Nahmias).

Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (Park, Tabarsi, Matsushima).

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Oct 1;239(4):347-353. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001117. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) is widely used for body region-specific injury severity. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) provides organ-specific injury severity but is not included in trauma databases. Previous researchers have used AIS as a surrogate for OIS. This study aims to assess AIS-abdomen concordance with AAST-OIS grade for liver and spleen injuries, hypothesizing concordance in terms of severity (grade of OIS and AIS) and patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study (July 2020 to June 2022) was performed at 3 trauma centers. Adult trauma patients with AAST-OIS grade III to V liver and spleen injury were included. AAST-OIS grade for each organ was compared with AIS-abdomen by evaluating the percentage of AAST-OIS grade correlating with each AIS score as well as rates of operative intervention for these injuries. Analysis was performed with chi-square tests and univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 472 patients, 274 had liver injuries and 205 had spleen injuries grades III to V. AAST-OIS grade III to V liver injuries had concordances rates of 85.5%, 71%, and 90.9% with corresponding AIS 3 to 5 scores. AAST-OIS grade III to V spleen injuries had concordances rates of 89.7%, 87.8%, and 87.3%, respectively. There was a statistical lack of concordance for both liver and spleen injuries (both p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher rates of operative intervention for AAST-OIS grade IV and V liver injuries and grade III and V spleen injuries vs corresponding AIS scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AIS should not be used interchangeably with OIS due to lack of concordance. AAST-OIS should be included in trauma databases to facilitate improved organ injury research and quality improvement projects.

摘要

背景

简明损伤定级(AIS)广泛用于身体特定区域的损伤严重程度评估。美国创伤外科学会器官损伤分级(AAST-OIS)提供了器官特异性的损伤严重程度评估,但并未包含在创伤数据库中。之前的研究人员曾使用 AIS 作为 OIS 的替代指标。本研究旨在评估腹部 AIS 与 AAST-OIS 分级在肝脏和脾脏损伤中的一致性,假设在严重程度(OIS 和 AIS 分级)和患者结局方面具有一致性。

研究设计

本回顾性研究(2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月)在 3 家创伤中心进行。纳入 AAST-OIS 分级为 III 至 V 级的肝脏和脾脏损伤的成年创伤患者。通过评估与每个 AIS 评分相关的 AAST-OIS 分级百分比以及这些损伤的手术干预率,比较每个器官的 AAST-OIS 分级与 AIS-腹部的关系。采用卡方检验和单因素分析进行分析。

结果

在 472 名患者中,274 名患者有肝脏损伤,205 名患者有脾脏损伤 III 至 V 级。AAST-OIS 分级 III 至 V 级的肝脏损伤与相应的 AIS 3 至 5 分级的一致性率分别为 85.5%、71%和 90.9%。AAST-OIS 分级 III 至 V 级的脾脏损伤的一致性率分别为 89.7%、87.8%和 87.3%。肝脏和脾脏损伤的一致性均存在统计学差异(均 p<0.001)。此外,AAST-OIS 分级为 IV 级和 V 级的肝脏损伤以及 III 级和 V 级的脾脏损伤的手术干预率均高于相应的 AIS 评分(p<0.05)。

结论

由于缺乏一致性,AIS 不应与 OIS 互换使用。AAST-OIS 应纳入创伤数据库,以促进更好的器官损伤研究和质量改进项目。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验