Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Regalia E, Cozzaglio L, Callegari L
Surgical Oncology A, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991 Jul-Aug;15(4):412-6. doi: 10.1177/0148607191015004412.
One hundred forty-four cancer patients harboring a central venous catheter (CVC) were prospectively investigated to assess the relationship between hub culture, clinical assessment of sepsis before removal, and CVC sepsis. In 22 patients, the CVC was removed because of clinical assessment of catheter sepsis expressed by the staff prior to the removal. For each CVC removal, peripheral blood (qualitative method), hub, and CVC tip (quantitative method) cultures were performed. Clinical sepsis (disappearance of fever after CVC removal) was observed in 13 patients, microbiologic "sepsis" (identification of the same microorganisms on the CVC tip and in the peripheral blood) in seven patients, and clinical and/or microbiologic sepsis in 16 patients. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the microorganism most frequently identified. Hub culture was negative in 48% and positive for a low number and a high number of colonies in 35% and 17%, respectively. The predictive value of hub culture was 96% when testing negative and 8% and 37% (p = 3 x 10(-3)) when testing positive for a low and a high number of colonies, respectively. Predictive values of clinical assessment were 55% if positive and 97% if negative. Combining hub cultures and clinical assessment, the risk of sepsis varied from 2% with both evaluations negative to 89% in the case of positive clinical assessment associated with positive high-count hub. Inasmuch as the CVCs used have a disposable hub, it is possible to have an accurate diagnosis of CVC sepsis without removing the CVC.
对144例留置中心静脉导管(CVC)的癌症患者进行前瞻性研究,以评估接头培养、拔除前脓毒症的临床评估与CVC脓毒症之间的关系。在22例患者中,由于工作人员在拔除前对导管脓毒症进行临床评估而拔除了CVC。每次拔除CVC时,均进行外周血(定性方法)、接头和CVC尖端(定量方法)培养。13例患者观察到临床脓毒症(拔除CVC后发热消失),7例患者观察到微生物学“脓毒症”(CVC尖端和外周血中鉴定出相同微生物),16例患者观察到临床和/或微生物学脓毒症。表皮葡萄球菌是最常鉴定出的微生物。接头培养阴性占48%,低菌落数阳性占35%,高菌落数阳性占17%。接头培养阴性时预测值为96%,低菌落数阳性时预测值为8%,高菌落数阳性时预测值为37%(p = 3×10⁻³)。临床评估的预测值阳性时为55%,阴性时为97%。将接头培养和临床评估相结合,脓毒症风险从两项评估均为阴性时的2%到临床评估阳性且接头高菌落数阳性时的89%不等。由于所使用的CVC具有一次性接头,因此在不拔除CVC的情况下也有可能准确诊断CVC脓毒症。