Janssen Wim A, Noorthoorn E O, de Vries W J, Hutschemeakers G J M, Lendemeijer H H G M, Widdershoven G A M
Kenniscentrum GGNet, Warnsveld, The Netherlands.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;31(6):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
The use of seclusion in psychiatric practice is a contentious issue in the Netherlands as well as other countries in and outside Europe. The aim of this study is to describe Dutch seclusion data and compare these with data on other countries, derived from the literature. An extensive search revealed only 11 articles containing seclusion rates of regions or whole countries either in Europe, Australia or the United States. Dutch seclusion rates were calculated from a governmental database and from a database covering twelve General Psychiatric Hospitals in the Netherlands. According to the hospitals database, on average one in four hospitalized patients experienced a seclusion episode. The mean duration according to the governmental database is a staggering 16 days. Both numbers seem much higher than comparable numbers in other countries. However, different definitions, inconsistent methods of registration, different methods of data collection and an inconsistent expression of the seclusion use in rates limit comparisons of the rates found in the reviewed studies with the data gathered in the current study. Suggestions are made to improve data collection, to enable better comparisons.
在荷兰以及欧洲内外的其他国家,精神病治疗中使用隔离措施是一个有争议的问题。本研究的目的是描述荷兰的隔离数据,并将其与从文献中获取的其他国家的数据进行比较。广泛的搜索仅发现11篇文章包含欧洲、澳大利亚或美国某些地区或整个国家的隔离率。荷兰的隔离率是根据一个政府数据库以及一个涵盖荷兰12家普通精神病医院的数据库计算得出的。根据医院数据库,平均每四名住院患者中就有一人经历过隔离事件。根据政府数据库,平均持续时间惊人地达到16天。这两个数字似乎都远高于其他国家的可比数字。然而,不同的定义、不一致的登记方法、不同的数据收集方法以及隔离使用率的不一致表达方式,限制了将综述研究中发现的比率与本研究收集的数据进行比较。文中提出了改进数据收集的建议,以便能进行更好的比较。