Massage Therapy Foundation, Evanston, Illinois, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, School of Nursing, Denver, Colorado, University of California at San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, California, University of Iowa, Community and Behavioral Health, Iowa City, Iowa and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2010 Dec;7(4):409-18. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nen029. Epub 2008 May 7.
Use of massage therapy by the general public has increased substantially in recent years. In light of the popularity of massage therapy for stress reduction, a comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed literature is important to summarize the effectiveness of this modality on stress-reactive physiological measures. On-line databases were searched for articles relevant to both massage therapy and stress. Articles were included in this review if (i) the massage therapy account consisted of manipulation of soft tissues and was conducted by a trained therapist, and (ii) a dependent measure to evaluate physiological stress was reported. Hormonal and physical parameters are reviewed. A total of 25 studies met all inclusion criteria. A majority of studies employed a 20-30 min massage administered twice-weekly over 5 weeks with evaluations conducted pre-post an individual session (single treatment) or following a series of sessions (multiple treatments). Single treatment reductions in salivary cortisol and heart rate were consistently noted. A sustained reduction for these measures was not supported in the literature, although the single-treatment effect was repeatable within a study. To date, the research data is insufficient to make definitive statements regarding the multiple treatment effect of massage therapy on urinary cortisol or catecholamines, but some evidence for a positive effect on diastolic blood pressure has been documented. While significant improvement has been demonstrated following massage therapy, the general research body on this topic lacks the necessary scientific rigor to provide a definitive understanding of the effect massage therapy has on many physiological variables associated with stress.
近年来,普通大众对按摩疗法的使用大幅增加。鉴于按摩疗法在减轻压力方面的普及,对同行评议文献进行全面综述对于总结这种方式对应激反应生理指标的有效性非常重要。在线数据库中搜索了与按摩疗法和压力相关的文章。如果符合以下条件,这些文章将被纳入本综述:(i)按摩疗法是指对软组织进行的推拿操作,由经过培训的治疗师进行,(ii)报告了评估生理应激的依赖指标。本文回顾了激素和物理参数。共有 25 项研究符合所有纳入标准。大多数研究采用了每周两次、每次 20-30 分钟的按摩治疗,在单次治疗(单次治疗)或一系列治疗后进行评估(多次治疗)。单次治疗可显著降低唾液皮质醇和心率。尽管在一项研究中单次治疗效果可以重复,但文献中并没有支持这些指标持续降低的证据。迄今为止,关于按摩疗法对尿皮质醇或儿茶酚胺的多次治疗效果的研究数据还不足以做出明确的结论,但有证据表明按摩疗法对舒张压有积极影响。尽管按摩疗法后有显著改善,但关于这一主题的总体研究缺乏必要的科学严谨性,无法确定按摩疗法对许多与压力相关的生理变量的影响。