• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一个简单易处理的模型预测和理解森林动态。

Predicting and understanding forest dynamics using a simple tractable model.

作者信息

Purves Drew W, Lichstein Jeremy W, Strigul Nikolay, Pacala Stephen W

机构信息

Computational Ecology and Environmental Science Group, Microsoft Research, Cambridge CB3 0FP, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17018-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807754105. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0807754105
PMID:18971335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2579370/
Abstract

The perfect-plasticity approximation (PPA) is an analytically tractable model of forest dynamics, defined in terms of parameters for individual trees, including allometry, growth, and mortality. We estimated these parameters for the eight most common species on each of four soil types in the US Lake states (Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota) by using short-term (</=15-year) inventory data from individual trees. We implemented 100-year PPA simulations given these parameters and compared these predictions to chronosequences of stand development. Predictions for the timing and magnitude of basal area dynamics and ecological succession on each soil were accurate, and predictions for the diameter distribution of 100-year-old stands were correct in form and slope. For a given species, the PPA provides analytical metrics for early-successional performance (H(20), height of a 20-year-old open-grown tree) and late-successional performance (Z*, equilibrium canopy height in monoculture). These metrics predicted which species were early or late successional on each soil type. Decomposing Z* showed that (i) succession is driven both by superior understory performance and superior canopy performance of late-successional species, and (ii) performance differences primarily reflect differences in mortality rather than growth. The predicted late-successional dominants matched chronosequences on xeromesic (Quercus rubra) and mesic (codominance by Acer rubrum and Acer saccharum) soil. On hydromesic and hydric soils, the literature reports that the current dominant species in old stands (Thuja occidentalis) is now failing to regenerate. Consistent with this, the PPA predicted that, on these soils, stands are now succeeding to dominance by other late-successional species (e.g., Fraxinus nigra, A. rubrum).

摘要

完美可塑性近似模型(PPA)是一种在分析上易于处理的森林动态模型,它依据单株树木的参数来定义,包括异速生长、生长和死亡率。我们利用单株树木的短期(≤15年)清查数据,估算了美国湖泊地区(密歇根州、威斯康星州和明尼苏达州)四种土壤类型中每种类型上最常见的八个物种的这些参数。基于这些参数,我们进行了100年的PPA模拟,并将这些预测结果与林分发育的年代序列进行了比较。对每种土壤上断面积动态和生态演替的时间及幅度的预测是准确的,对100年林分直径分布的预测在形式和斜率上也是正确的。对于给定的物种,PPA提供了早期演替表现(H(20),20年生孤立木的高度)和晚期演替表现(Z*,单作中的平衡林冠高度)的分析指标。这些指标预测了每种土壤类型上哪些物种是早期或晚期演替物种。对Z*进行分解表明:(i)演替既由晚期演替物种在林下和林冠层的优势表现驱动,(ii)表现差异主要反映死亡率的差异而非生长差异。预测的晚期演替优势种与旱中生境(红栎)和中生境(红花槭和糖槭共优势)土壤上的年代序列相匹配。在湿中生境和湿地土壤上,文献报道老龄林分中的当前优势种(美国金钟柏)现在无法更新。与此一致的是,PPA预测在这些土壤上,林分现在正被其他晚期演替物种(如黑梣、红花槭)取代并占据优势。

相似文献

1
Predicting and understanding forest dynamics using a simple tractable model.使用一个简单易处理的模型预测和理解森林动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17018-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807754105. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
2
Sapling growth as a function of light and landscape-level variation in soil water and foliar nitrogen in Northern Michigan.密歇根州北部幼树生长与光照、景观尺度土壤水分及叶片氮含量变化的关系
Oecologia. 2006 Feb;147(1):119-33. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0252-8. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
3
Shifts in southern Wisconsin forest canopy and understory richness, composition, and heterogeneity.威斯康星州南部森林冠层及林下植被丰富度、组成和异质性的变化。
Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2482-92. doi: 10.1890/07-1129.1.
4
Co-dominance and succession in forest dynamics: the role of interspecific differences in crown transmissivity.林分动态中的共优和演替:冠层透光率种间差异的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Sep 21;285(1):46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
5
Looking for age-related growth decline in natural forests: unexpected biomass patterns from tree rings and simulated mortality.寻找自然森林中的年龄相关生长衰退:来自树木年轮和模拟死亡率的意外生物量模式。
Oecologia. 2014 May;175(1):363-74. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2881-2. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
6
Size-mediated tree transpiration along soil drainage gradients in a boreal black spruce forest wildfire chronosequence.沿土壤排水梯度的大小介导的树木蒸腾作用在北方黑云杉林火烧演替系列中。
Tree Physiol. 2012 May;32(5):599-611. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps021. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
7
Assessing the potential of native tree species for carbon sequestration forestry in Northeast China.评估中国东北地区乡土树种用于碳汇林业的潜力。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;85(3):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.027. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
8
Modeled effects of soil acidification on long-term ecological and economic outcomes for managed forests in the Adirondack region (USA).酸化土壤对阿迪朗达克地区(美国)人工林长期生态和经济影响的模拟。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:401-411. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.景观开发、森林火灾与荒野管理。
Science. 1974 Nov 8;186(4163):487-95. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4163.487.
10
Landscape ecosystem classification in the Cherokee National Forest, east Tennessee, U.S.A.美国田纳西州东部切罗基国家森林的景观生态分类
Environ Monit Assess. 1996 Jan;39(1-3):323-38. doi: 10.1007/BF00396152.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonnative tree invaders lead to declines in native tree species richness.外来入侵树种导致本地树种丰富度下降。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 29;122(17):e2424908122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2424908122. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Multiscale predictors of small tree survival across a heterogeneous tropical landscape.跨异质热带景观中小树生存的多尺度预测因子。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0280322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280322. eCollection 2023.
3
A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Service Models.整合生物多样性、生态系统功能和生态系统服务模型的概念框架。
Bioscience. 2022 Sep 1;72(11):1062-1073. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac074. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Growth, death, and resource competition in sessile organisms.固着生物的生长、死亡和资源竞争。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020424118.
5
Impacts of Degradation on Water, Energy, and Carbon Cycling of the Amazon Tropical Forests.退化对亚马逊热带森林水、能量和碳循环的影响。
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020 Aug;125(8):e2020JG005677. doi: 10.1029/2020JG005677. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
A tree's quest for light-optimal height and diameter growth under a shading canopy.树木对光的追求——在遮荫冠层下的最佳高度和直径生长。
Tree Physiol. 2021 Jan 9;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa110.
7
Organizing principles for vegetation dynamics.植被动态组织原则。
Nat Plants. 2020 May;6(5):444-453. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0655-x. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
An overview of agent-based models in plant biology and ecology.基于主体的模型在植物生物学和生态学中的概述。
Ann Bot. 2020 Sep 14;126(4):539-557. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa043.
9
Will natural resistance result in populations of ash trees remaining in British woodlands after a century of ash dieback disease?在经历一个世纪的灰树枯梢病之后,自然抗性会使英国林地中留存有灰树种群吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Aug 28;6(8):190908. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190908. eCollection 2019 Aug.
10
Dome patterns in pelagic size spectra reveal strong trophic cascades.远洋大小谱中的穹顶模式揭示了强烈的营养级联。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 27;10(1):4396. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12289-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests.功能性状能否很好地预测种群统计学率?来自五个新热带森林的证据。
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1908-20. doi: 10.1890/07-0207.1.
2
Predictive models of forest dynamics.森林动态预测模型。
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1452-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1155359.
3
Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests.森林与气候变化:作用力、反馈及森林的气候效益
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1444-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1155121.
4
Understanding height-structured competition in forests: is there an R* for light?理解森林中高度结构竞争:是否存在光照的R*值?
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):3039-47. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0891.
5
Crown plasticity and competition for canopy space: a new spatially implicit model parameterized for 250 North American tree species.树冠可塑性和对冠层空间的竞争:为 250 种北美树种参数化的新的空间隐含模型。
PLoS One. 2007 Sep 12;2(9):e870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000870.
6
How close are we to a predictive science of the biosphere?我们距离建立一个能预测生物圈的科学有多近?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jul;21(7):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 May 12.
7
The importance of demographic niches to tree diversity.种群生态位对树木多样性的重要性。
Science. 2006 Jul 7;313(5783):98-101. doi: 10.1126/science.1124712. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
8
Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and lianas.热带树木和藤本植物的生活史权衡
Ecology. 2006 May;87(5):1281-8. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1281:lhtitt]2.0.co;2.
9
Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests.土地利用历史对美国森林碳积累的贡献。
Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1148-51. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1148.