Suppr超能文献

子宫切除术电刺激麻醉的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of electrostimulation anaesthesia for hysterectomy.

作者信息

Böhrer H, Quintel M, Fischer M V

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Aug;35(6):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03342.x.

Abstract

A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of electrostimulation anaesthesia (ESA) when compared with neurolept anaesthesia (NLA). One hundred patients scheduled for hysterectomy received either ESA or NLA. Higher levels of mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the ESA group make this technique less suitable for patients with a history of arterial hypertension. A higher dose of muscle relaxants was used in the ESA group. Measured stress variables like plasma glucose, cortisol, and iron indicate maintenance of the stress response during ESA. The postoperative questionnaire revealed intraoperative recall in 12% of ESA patients. We conclude that "pure" ESA based on a N2O regimen should be avoided.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估电刺激麻醉(ESA)与神经安定麻醉(NLA)相比的疗效。100例计划行子宫切除术的患者接受了ESA或NLA。ESA组较高的平均动脉压和心率水平使得该技术不太适合有动脉高血压病史的患者。ESA组使用了更高剂量的肌肉松弛剂。所测量的应激变量如血糖、皮质醇和铁表明在ESA期间应激反应持续存在。术后问卷调查显示,12%的ESA患者术中出现回忆。我们得出结论,应避免基于一氧化二氮方案的“纯”ESA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验