Böhrer H, Quintel M, Fischer M V
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Aug;35(6):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03342.x.
A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of electrostimulation anaesthesia (ESA) when compared with neurolept anaesthesia (NLA). One hundred patients scheduled for hysterectomy received either ESA or NLA. Higher levels of mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the ESA group make this technique less suitable for patients with a history of arterial hypertension. A higher dose of muscle relaxants was used in the ESA group. Measured stress variables like plasma glucose, cortisol, and iron indicate maintenance of the stress response during ESA. The postoperative questionnaire revealed intraoperative recall in 12% of ESA patients. We conclude that "pure" ESA based on a N2O regimen should be avoided.
进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估电刺激麻醉(ESA)与神经安定麻醉(NLA)相比的疗效。100例计划行子宫切除术的患者接受了ESA或NLA。ESA组较高的平均动脉压和心率水平使得该技术不太适合有动脉高血压病史的患者。ESA组使用了更高剂量的肌肉松弛剂。所测量的应激变量如血糖、皮质醇和铁表明在ESA期间应激反应持续存在。术后问卷调查显示,12%的ESA患者术中出现回忆。我们得出结论,应避免基于一氧化二氮方案的“纯”ESA。