Suppr超能文献

对堕胎和“出生后堕胎”的人格论论据的限制。

Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.

机构信息

Centre for Professional Ethics (PEAK), Chancellor's Building, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e15-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100958.

Abstract

Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant something moral status, it is not a necessary condition. Secondly, even if a person is that which has the 'highest' moral status, this does not mean that any interests of a person are justifiable grounds to kill something that has a 'lower' moral status. Additional justification is needed to overcome a basic wrongness associated with killing something possessing moral status. There are clear arguments already available in this regard in the case of a foetus that are not available in the case of a newborn infant. Hence, there is scope to consistently hold that abortion may be permissible but that after-birth abortion may not be permissible.

摘要

在确立道德地位时,人格论的使用存在两个显著的局限性。首先,尽管赋予人格可能使我们有充分的理由赋予某物道德地位,但这不是必要条件。其次,即使一个人具有“最高”的道德地位,这并不意味着一个人的任何利益都是杀死具有“较低”道德地位的东西的合理理由。需要额外的理由来克服与杀死具有道德地位的东西相关的基本错误。在这方面,已经有明确的论据可用于胎儿,但新生儿的情况则不然。因此,有理由一致认为堕胎可能是允许的,但产后堕胎可能是不允许的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验