• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电磁场会增强环境致癌物的作用吗?

Do electromagnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens?

作者信息

Juutilainen Jukka

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland. jukka.juutilainen@uku. fi

出版信息

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):228-31. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn258. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncn258
PMID:18977776
Abstract

Epidemiological studies have reported an increased risk of leukaemia in children who are exposed to extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MF), suggesting that ELF MFs may be carcinogenic to humans. No carcinogenic effects have been found in animal studies that have tested ELF MFs alone. Similarly, genotoxicity studies have generally not shown effects from MFs alone. However, ELF MFs have been reported to enhance the effects of known carcinogenic or mutagenic agents in a few animal studies and in several in vitro studies. This paper discusses the findings of studies on such combined effects. The majority of in vitro studies have reported positive findings, which supports the conclusion that MFs of 100 microT or higher interact with other chemical and physical agents. Further studies should address biophysical mechanisms and dose-response relationship below 100 microT. Animal studies designed according to the classical initiation-promotion concept may not be sufficient for studying the cocarcinogenic effects of MFs, and further studies using novel study designs would be useful. Epidemiological data on the interaction between MFs and other environmental agents are scant and inconclusive, and any further studies may be difficult because of the scarcity of subjects with suitable combined exposures.

摘要

流行病学研究报告称,暴露于极低频(ELF)磁场(MF)的儿童患白血病的风险增加,这表明ELF磁场可能对人类具有致癌性。在单独测试ELF磁场的动物研究中未发现致癌作用。同样,遗传毒性研究一般也未显示仅磁场会产生影响。然而,在一些动物研究和多项体外研究中,据报道ELF磁场会增强已知致癌或诱变剂的作用。本文讨论了关于此类联合效应的研究结果。大多数体外研究报告了阳性结果,这支持了以下结论:100微特斯拉或更高的磁场会与其他化学和物理因素相互作用。进一步的研究应探讨低于100微特斯拉时的生物物理机制和剂量反应关系。根据经典的启动-促进概念设计的动物研究可能不足以研究磁场的促癌作用,采用新的研究设计进行进一步研究将很有帮助。关于磁场与其他环境因素相互作用的流行病学数据很少且尚无定论,由于具有合适联合暴露的受试者稀缺,任何进一步的研究可能都很困难。

相似文献

1
Do electromagnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens?电磁场会增强环境致癌物的作用吗?
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):228-31. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn258. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
2
Do extremely low frequency magnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.极低频磁场会增强环境致癌物的影响吗?一项实验研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2006 Jan;82(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/09553000600577839.
3
Exposure to electromagnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukaemia: a review.暴露于电磁场与儿童白血病风险:综述
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):202-11. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn270. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
4
Apartment electrical wiring: a cause of extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure in residential areas.公寓电气布线:居民区极低频磁场暴露的一个原因。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2005 Apr;26(3):238-41. doi: 10.1002/bem.20099.
5
[Sister chromatid exchange (SCE)and high-frequency cells in workers professionally exposed to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF)].职业暴露于极低频磁场(ELF)的工人中的姐妹染色单体交换(SCE)和高频细胞
Med Lav. 2003 Sep-Oct;94(5):450-8.
6
[Evaluation of genotoxic and/or co-genotoxic effects in cells exposed in vitro to extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fields].[体外暴露于极低频电磁场的细胞的遗传毒性和/或共遗传毒性作用评估]
Ann Ig. 2004 Jan-Apr;16(1-2):321-40.
7
Extremely low frequency-magnetic fields (ELF-EMF) occupational exposure and natural killer activity in peripheral blood lymphocytes.极低频磁场(ELF-EMF)职业暴露与外周血淋巴细胞中的自然杀伤活性
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 15;407(3):1218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
Exposure assessment and other challenges in non-ionizing radiation studies of childhood leukaemia.儿童白血病非电离辐射研究中的暴露评估及其他挑战。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):139-47. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn260. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
9
Selection bias and its implications for case-control studies: a case study of magnetic field exposure and childhood leukaemia.选择偏倚及其对病例对照研究的影响:以磁场暴露与儿童白血病为例的案例研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):397-406. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi245. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
10
Non-cancer EMF effects related to children.与儿童相关的非癌症电磁效应。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S69-74. doi: 10.1002/bem.20153.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields on circadian rhythm control in mice.50赫兹磁场对小鼠昼夜节律控制的影响。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2019 May;40(4):250-259. doi: 10.1002/bem.22188. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
2
Interactions between occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and chemicals for brain tumour risk in the INTEROCC study.职业性暴露于极低频磁场与化学物质之间的相互作用对INTEROCC研究中脑肿瘤风险的影响
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Nov;74(11):802-809. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104080. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
LF-MF inhibits iron metabolism and suppresses lung cancer through activation of P53-miR-34a-E2F1/E2F3 pathway.
LF-MF 通过激活 P53-miR-34a-E2F1/E2F3 通路抑制铁代谢并抑制肺癌。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 7;7(1):749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00913-2.
4
The effect of extremely low-frequency magnetic field (50-60 Hz) exposure on spontaneous apoptosis: The results of a meta-analysis.极低频磁场(50 - 60赫兹)暴露对自发凋亡的影响:一项荟萃分析的结果
Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Aug 30;5:141. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.187375. eCollection 2016.
5
Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field from Convective Air Warming System on Temperature Selection and Distance.对流式空气加热系统产生的极低频电磁场对温度选择和距离的影响
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Dec;43(12):1635-9.
6
Impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on human lymphocyte DNA integrity.心脏磁共振成像对人淋巴细胞 DNA 完整性的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(30):2340-5. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht184. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Retinoic acid inhibits the cytoproliferative response to weak 50‑Hz magnetic fields in neuroblastoma cells.视黄酸抑制神经母细胞瘤细胞对弱 50Hz 磁场的细胞增殖反应。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Mar;29(3):885-94. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2212. Epub 2012 Dec 24.