Suppr超能文献

昼夜节律类型和社会时间线索对睡眠/觉醒模式的影响。

Influence of chronotype and social zeitgebers on sleep/wake patterns.

作者信息

Korczak A L, Martynhak B J, Pedrazzoli M, Brito A F, Louzada F M

机构信息

Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008 Oct;41(10):914-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008005000047. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

Abstract

Inter-individual differences in the phase of the endogenous circadian rhythms have been established. Individuals with early circadian phase are called morning types; those with late circadian phase are evening types. The Horne and Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) is the most frequently used to assess individual chronotype. The distribution of MEQ scores is likely to be biased by several fact, ors, such as gender, age, genetic background, latitude, and social habits. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of different social synchronizers on the sleep/wake cycle of persons with different chronotypes. Volunteers were selected from a total of 1232 UFPR undergraduate students who completed the MEQ. Thirty-two subjects completed the study, including 8 morning types, 8 evening types and 16 intermediate types. Sleep schedules were recorded by actigraphy for 1 week on two occasions: during the school term and during vacation. Sleep onset and offset times, sleep duration, and mid-sleep time for each chronotype group were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test separately for school term and vacation. School term and vacation data were compared by the Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Morning types showed earlier sleep times and longer sleep duration compared with evening types (23:00 +/- 44 and 508.9 +/- 50.27 vs 01:08 +/- 61.95 and 456.44 +/- 59.08, for the weekdays during vacation). During vacation, the subjects showed later sleep times, except for the morning types, who did not exhibit differences for sleep onset times. The results support the idea that social schedules have an impact on the expression of circadian rhythmicity but this impact depends on the individual chronotype.

摘要

内源性昼夜节律的相位存在个体差异。昼夜节律相位早的个体被称为早晨型;昼夜节律相位晚的个体被称为夜晚型。霍恩和奥斯特伯格晨型-夜型问卷(MEQ)是最常用于评估个体昼夜节律类型的工具。MEQ得分的分布可能会受到多种因素的影响,如性别、年龄、遗传背景、纬度和社会习惯。本研究的目的是确定不同的社会同步因素对不同昼夜节律类型个体的睡眠/觉醒周期的影响。志愿者从1232名完成MEQ的巴西巴拉那联邦大学本科生中选取。32名受试者完成了研究,包括8名早晨型、8名夜晚型和16名中间型。通过活动记录仪在两个时间段记录1周的睡眠时间表:学期期间和假期期间。分别对学期和假期,采用曼-惠特尼U检验比较各昼夜节律类型组的入睡和起床时间、睡眠时间和睡眠中间时间。采用威尔科克森配对检验比较学期和假期的数据。与夜晚型相比,早晨型的睡眠时间更早,睡眠时间更长(假期期间工作日,分别为23:00±44和508.9±50.27与01:08±61.95和456.44±59.08)。在假期期间,除早晨型外,受试者的睡眠时间较晚,早晨型的入睡时间没有差异。结果支持这样的观点,即社会时间表对昼夜节律的表达有影响,但这种影响取决于个体的昼夜节律类型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验