Ronco Claudio, Cruz Dinna, Oudemans van Straaten Helen, Honore Patrick, House Andrew, Bin Du, Gibney Noel
Nephrology Department, St Bortolo Hospital, Viale Rodolfi 37, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Crit Care. 2008;12(5):308. doi: 10.1186/cc7016. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
The optimal dialysis dose for acute kidney injury is a matter of great controversy. Clinical trials, predominantly single-center studies, have shown conflicting results. The Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study was designed to compare clinical outcomes between patients allocated to an intensive dose versus a less-intensive dose of renal replacement therapy. Recently, the results of this large randomized controlled multicenter study were published. The present article will discuss certain aspects of this trial: the overall design, the baseline patient characteristics, and comparison of the results with earlier studies. Finally, the article will address the implications of the ATN Study results for clinical practice.
急性肾损伤的最佳透析剂量是一个极具争议的问题。临床试验,主要是单中心研究,结果相互矛盾。急性肾衰竭试验网络(ATN)研究旨在比较接受强化剂量与较低强度剂量肾脏替代治疗的患者的临床结局。最近,这项大型随机对照多中心研究的结果已发表。本文将讨论该试验的某些方面:总体设计、患者基线特征以及结果与早期研究的比较。最后,本文将探讨ATN研究结果对临床实践的影响。