• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗决策中的专业关系。

Professional relationships in palliative care decision making.

作者信息

Lee Susan F, Kristjanson Linda J, Williams Anne M

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z. Epub 2008 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z
PMID:18987900
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision making in the context of palliative care is particularly complex given the unpredictable illness trajectories experienced by patients and the number of individuals who may be part of decision-making processes. This study aimed to describe the significant issues that influence the processes of care decision making, from the perspective of patients with advanced illness.

METHODS

Patients (14), family members (7) and health professionals (18) were interviewed and field observations (100 h) of decision-making practices were undertaken in two Australian palliative care services. A systematic approach using grounded theory to collect and analyse the data was used to develop a theory of decision making from the patient's perspective.

RESULTS

The main issue experienced by palliative care patients was identified as a lack of involvement in decision making. One of the significant factors affecting the decision process is the type of relationship with health professionals that patients believe enhances their involvement in decision making. This was determined by the manner and focus of the health professional, their trustworthiness as well as the healthcare culture and environment. This paper provides a greater understanding of the perspective of patients in relation to their involvement in decisions related to palliative care.

摘要

背景

鉴于患者经历的不可预测的疾病轨迹以及可能参与决策过程的人员数量,姑息治疗背景下的决策尤其复杂。本研究旨在从晚期疾病患者的角度描述影响护理决策过程的重要问题。

方法

对14名患者、7名家庭成员和18名卫生专业人员进行了访谈,并在澳大利亚的两家姑息治疗服务机构对决策实践进行了100小时的实地观察。采用扎根理论的系统方法收集和分析数据,以从患者角度建立决策理论。

结果

姑息治疗患者经历的主要问题被确定为缺乏参与决策。影响决策过程的一个重要因素是患者认为能增强其参与决策的与卫生专业人员的关系类型。这取决于卫生专业人员的方式和重点、他们的可信度以及医疗文化和环境。本文更深入地理解了患者在参与姑息治疗相关决策方面的观点。

相似文献

1
Professional relationships in palliative care decision making.姑息治疗决策中的专业关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
2
Patient participation in palliative care decisions: An ethnographic discourse analysis.患者参与姑息治疗决策:一项人种志话语分析
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Nov 22;11:32438. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.32438. eCollection 2016.
3
Patient approaches to clinical conversations in the palliative care setting.姑息治疗环境中患者参与临床对话的方式。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(4):333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03202.x.
4
Patient and family caregiver decision making in the context of advanced cancer.晚期癌症背景下的患者和家属决策。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;35(3):178-86. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31822786f6.
5
Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: A qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences.家庭参与癌症治疗决策:一项关于患者、家庭及临床医生态度与经历的定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1146-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
The decision-making process of palliative care among male caregivers of chronically ill patients-A grounded theory study.慢性疾病患者男性照顾者姑息治疗决策过程的扎根理论研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Oct;30(5):e13280. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13280. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Life-and-death decision-making in the acute phase after a severe stroke: Interviews with relatives.重症中风急性期的生死决策:对亲属的访谈
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):451-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216314563427. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
What influences patients' decisions regarding palliative care in advance care planning discussions? Perspectives from a qualitative study conducted with advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals.影响患者在预先护理计划讨论中选择姑息治疗的因素有哪些?一项对晚期癌症患者、家属和医疗保健专业人员进行的定性研究的观点。
Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;33(10):1299-1309. doi: 10.1177/0269216319866641. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
10
Decision-making in palliative care practice and the need for moral deliberation: a qualitative study.姑息治疗实践中的决策制定与道德审议的必要性:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Mar;56(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.03.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis.癌症姑息治疗中的共同决策:系统评价和元综合。
Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;38(4):406-422. doi: 10.1177/02692163241238384. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?信任如何影响患者参与决策的偏好?
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00296.x.
2
"Symbiotic niceness": constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care.“共生式友善”:构建心理社会姑息治疗中的治疗关系
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2571-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.006.
3
The tyrannies of palliative care.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2001 Dec;7(12):572-3. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2001.7.12.9288.
4
Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data.患者对医生的信任:理论众多,测量方法稀缺,数据匮乏。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul;15(7):509-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x.
5
Autonomy, power, and control in palliative care.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999 Spring;8(2):139-47. doi: 10.1017/s0963180199802035.
6
Promoting patient decision making in life-and-death situations.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 1998 May;14(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(98)80018-1.
7
Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性的信息需求与决策偏好
JAMA. 1997 May 14;277(18):1485-92.
8
Paternalism and partial autonomy.家长式作风与部分自主性
J Med Ethics. 1984 Dec;10(4):173-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.4.173.
9
Interactional styles of nurse practitioners and physicians regarding patient decision making.
Nurs Res. 1989 Jan-Feb;38(1):50-5.
10
Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):941-50. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9.