Rash Carla J, Copeland Amy L
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Nov;10(11):1633-43. doi: 10.1080/14622200802409990.
A brief form of the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult (SCQ-A) was developed as an economical alternative to the 55-item SCQ-A in assessing smoking outcome expectancies in adult, heavy smokers. A total of 25 items (two to three items per each of the 10 SCQ-A scales) were administered to current smokers and ex-smokers. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine whether the brief form was better accounted for by a 4- or 10-factor model. Several variants of 9- and 8-factor models also were compared. The 10-factor model, representing the 10 subscales of the full-length SCQ-A, fit the data more adequately than the other models. The Brief SCQ-A (BSCQ-A) scales demonstrated good internal consistency (mean coefficient alpha = .79) and convergent validity. The BSCQ-A also showed promising validity in distinguishing among current smokers and ex-smokers. In a separate sample of smokers, strong and positive associations were present between corresponding pairs of the SCQ-A and BSCQ-A subscales.
吸烟后果问卷-成人简版（SCQ-A）被开发出来，作为55项SCQ-A的一种经济替代方案，用于评估成年重度吸烟者的吸烟结果预期。总共25个项目（SCQ-A的10个量表每个量表有两到三个项目）被施测于当前吸烟者和已戒烟者。验证性因素分析用于确定简版由四因素模型还是十因素模型能更好地解释。还比较了九因素模型和八因素模型的几个变体。代表全长SCQ-A十个分量表的十因素模型比其他模型更能充分拟合数据。简版SCQ-A（BSCQ-A）量表显示出良好的内部一致性（平均α系数 = 0.79）和收敛效度。BSCQ-A在区分当前吸烟者和已戒烟者方面也显示出有前景的效度。在一个单独的吸烟者样本中，SCQ-A和BSCQ-A分量表的相应配对之间存在强烈的正相关。
Zotero 插件