Schaad Norman W, Postnikova Elena, Sechler Aaron, Claflin Larry E, Vidaver Anne K, Jones Jeffrey B, Agarkova Irina, Ignatov Alexander, Dickstein Ellen, Ramundo Bruce A
ARS-USDA, Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, 1301 Ditto Avenue, Ft. Detrick, MD 21702, USA.
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008 Dec;31(6-8):434-46. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
The bacterium Acidovorax avenae causes disease in a wide range of economically important monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, including corn, rice, watermelon, anthurium, and orchids. Genotypic and phenotypic relatedness among strains of phytopathogenic A. avenae subsp. avenae, A. avenae subsp. citrulli, A. avenae subsp. cattleyae and A. konjaci, as well as all other Acidovorax species, including A. facilis, the type strain of Acidovorax, was determined. The 16s rDNA sequencing confirmed previous studies showing the environmental species to be very distant from the phytopathogenic species. DNA/DNA reassociation assays on the different strains of A. avenae revealed four (A, B, C, and D) distinct genotypes. Taxon A included six A. avenae subsp. avenae strains from corn that had a mean reciprocal similarity of 81%; taxon B included six A. avenae subsp. avenae strains from rice that had a mean reciprocal similarity of 97%; taxon C contained 11 A. avenae subsp. citrulli strains from cucurbits (cantaloupe, watermelon, and pumpkin) that had a mean reciprocal similarity of 88%, and taxon D contained four A. avenae subsp. cattleyae strains from orchids that had a mean similarity of 98%. The mean reciprocal relatedness between taxa A, B, C, and D was less than 70%. Sequence analysis of 16S rDNA and the 16S-23S rDNA internally transcribed spacer region, as well as AFLP analysis, revealed the same four taxa. All four were easily differentiated phenotypically from each other and from all other recognized Acidovorax species. Strains of A. avenae did not contain 3-hydroxyoctanoic acid, which was found in all other species. On the basis of these and previous genetic and phenotypic results, we propose an emendation of the species A. avenae. A. avenae subsp. citrulli (C strains) and A. avenae subsp. cattleyae (D strains) should be elevated to species rank as A. citrulli and A. cattleyae, respectively. We further propose a new taxon for the B strains, A. oryzae sp. nov. with FC-143T = ICPB 30003T = ICMP 3960T = ATCC 19882T as the type strain.
燕麦嗜酸菌可导致多种具有重要经济价值的单子叶和双子叶植物发病,包括玉米、水稻、西瓜、红掌和兰花。对植物致病性燕麦嗜酸菌燕麦亚种、西瓜亚种、卡特兰亚种和魔芋嗜酸菌,以及所有其他嗜酸菌属物种,包括嗜酸菌属的模式菌株敏捷嗜酸菌的基因型和表型相关性进行了测定。16s rDNA测序证实了先前的研究结果,即环境物种与植物致病物种差异很大。对不同燕麦嗜酸菌菌株进行的DNA/DNA重杂交分析揭示了四个(A、B、C和D)不同的基因型。分类群A包括来自玉米的6株燕麦嗜酸菌燕麦亚种菌株,其平均相互相似性为81%;分类群B包括来自水稻的6株燕麦嗜酸菌燕麦亚种菌株,其平均相互相似性为97%;分类群C包含11株来自葫芦科植物(哈密瓜、西瓜和南瓜)的燕麦嗜酸菌西瓜亚种菌株,其平均相互相似性为88%,分类群D包含4株来自兰花的燕麦嗜酸菌卡特兰亚种菌株,其平均相似性为98%o分类群A、B、C和D之间的平均相互相关性小于70%。对16S rDNA和16S-23S rDNA内部转录间隔区的序列分析以及AFLP分析,揭示了相同的四个分类群。所有四个分类群在表型上彼此之间以及与所有其他公认的嗜酸菌属物种都很容易区分。燕麦嗜酸菌菌株不含3-羟基辛酸,而在所有其他物种中都发现了这种物质。基于这些以及先前的遗传和表型结果,我们提议对燕麦嗜酸菌物种进行修订。燕麦嗜酸菌西瓜亚种(C菌株)和燕麦嗜酸菌卡特兰亚种(D菌株)应分别提升为西瓜嗜酸菌和卡特兰嗜酸菌的物种等级。我们进一步提议为B菌株设立一个新的分类群,即稻嗜酸菌新种,以FC-143T = ICPB 30003T = ICMP 3960T = ATCC 19882T作为模式菌株。