• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

库尔特STKS的现场评估。

A field evaluation of the Coulter STKS.

作者信息

Warner B A, Reardon D M

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Feb;95(2):207-17. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.2.207.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/95.2.207
PMID:1899530
Abstract

The performance of the Coulter STKS (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) was evaluated in a busy computerized teaching hospital laboratory. The STKS was compared with a Coulter S Plus IV and manually performed 400 white blood-cell differentials. The measured blood-count parameters (i.e., white blood cells [WBCs], red blood cells [RBCs], hemoglobulin [Hb], mean corpuscular volume [MCV], and platelets [PLTs]), compared very well between the two aperture impedance-based systems; precision, linearity, and lack of carryover were excellent. The STKS WBC differential (DIFF), derived from a combination of aperture impedance, aperture conductance, and laser light scatter, also was precise; linear and carryover were insignificant. The DIFFs (n = 424) compared well to the manual WBC differentials, with r values of 0.97, 0.97, 0.73, and 0.86 for neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils, respectively. The DIFF and Suspect Flagging system produced 6.2% false negatives and 2.6% false positives when compared with the manual technique. These were further investigated and discussed. STKS DIFFs were stable for 18 to 24 hours in normal samples anticoagulated with K2EDTA and stored at 20 degrees C prior to analysis. Storage in the same anticoagulant at 4 degrees C and immediate aspiration preserved the DIFF analysis for considerably longer than 24 hours. These performance characteristics make the STKS a significant advancement in automated hematology.

摘要

在一家繁忙的计算机化教学医院实验室中,对库尔特STKS(库尔特公司,佛罗里达州海厄利亚)进行了性能评估。将STKS与库尔特S Plus IV进行比较,并手动进行了400次白细胞分类计数。在这两种基于孔径阻抗的系统之间,所测量的血细胞计数参数(即白细胞[WBC]、红细胞[RBC]、血红蛋白[Hb]、平均红细胞体积[MCV]和血小板[PLT])的比较结果非常好;精密度、线性度和无残留性都很出色。STKS白细胞分类计数(DIFF)源自孔径阻抗、孔径电导和激光散射的组合,也很精确;线性和残留均不显著。DIFF(n = 424)与手动白细胞分类计数的比较结果良好,中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的r值分别为0.97、0.97、0.73和0.86。与手动技术相比,DIFF和可疑标记系统产生了6.2%的假阴性和2.6%的假阳性。对此进行了进一步的调查和讨论。在用K2EDTA抗凝并在20摄氏度下储存直至分析之前,正常样本中的STKS DIFF在18至24小时内保持稳定。在4摄氏度下用相同抗凝剂储存并立即吸取,可使DIFF分析的保存时间大大超过24小时。这些性能特征使STKS在自动化血液学领域取得了重大进展。

相似文献

1
A field evaluation of the Coulter STKS.库尔特STKS的现场评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Feb;95(2):207-17. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.2.207.
2
An evaluation of leucocyte analysis on the Coulter STKS.库尔特STKS白细胞分析评估
Clin Lab Haematol. 1992;14(1):53-68.
3
Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.库尔特STKS的评估与性能
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Mar;31(3):179-86.
4
Evaluation of the ABX Cobas Vega automated hematology analyzer and comparison with the Coulter STKS.ABX Cobas Vega全自动血液分析仪的评估及与库尔特STKS的比较。
Hematol Cell Ther. 1997 Jun;39(3):149-58. doi: 10.1007/s00282-997-0149-6.
5
Evaluation of the Roche Cobas Argos 5Diff automated haematology analyser with comparison to a Coulter STKS.罗氏Cobas Argos 5Diff全自动血液分析仪与库尔特STKS的对比评估。
Clin Lab Haematol. 1994 Jun;16(2):117-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1994.tb00398.x.
6
Automated haematology analysers: a four-way comparison.自动血液学分析仪:四项对比
Med Lab Sci. 1990 Oct;47(4):285-96.
7
Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.自动化五分类白细胞计数。血液分析仪Sysmex SE - 9000、Sysmex NE - 8000和库尔特STKS软件生成的白细胞可疑标记的效率。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jun;121(6):573-7.
8
Two-centre evaluation of the Abbott CD3500 blood counter.雅培CD3500血液计数器的双中心评估
Clin Lab Haematol. 1995 Mar;17(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1995.tb00311.x.
9
Comparison of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3000 SL and the Coulter STKS hematology analyzers.雅培Cell Dyn 3000 SL血液分析仪与库尔特STKS血液分析仪的比较。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1994 May-Jun;24(3):250-8.
10
Evaluation of the Coulter STKS five-part differential.库尔特STKS五分类法的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jan;99(1):72-81. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/99.1.72.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of Selected WBC Differentiation Flags in Sysmex XT-1800i.Sysmex XT-1800i 中选定白细胞分化标志物的有效性
Iran J Pathol. 2016 Spring;11(2):97-103.