Pears Katherine C, Kim Hyoun K, Fisher Philip A
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Oct;32(10):958-71. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Up to 90% of child welfare system cases involve multiple types of maltreatment; however, studies have rarely incorporated multiple dimensions of maltreatment. The present study employed a latent profile analysis to identify naturally occurring subgroups of children who had experienced maltreatment.
Reports of maltreatment incidents for 117 preschool-aged foster children were classified along two dimensions: type (e.g., physical abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, supervisory neglect, or emotional maltreatment) and severity within type.
The analyses revealed four distinct profiles showing moderate to high levels of maltreatment: (a) supervisory neglect/emotional maltreatment; (b) sexual abuse/emotional maltreatment/neglect (when not otherwise specified neglect refers to both supervisory and physical neglect); (c) physical abuse/emotional maltreatment/neglect; and (d) sexual abuse/physical abuse/emotional maltreatment/neglect. Profile membership was examined with respect to the children's cognitive functioning and externalizing and internalizing problems: lower cognitive functioning was related to profiles with neglect or physical abuse (or both), externalizing was highest in the sexual abuse/physical abuse/emotional maltreatment/neglect profile, and internalizing was highest in the profiles with physical or sexual abuse (or both).
There appear to be distinct profiles of maltreatment among preschoolers that have differential associations to measures of adjustment. Policy and practice implications and future research directions are discussed.
Using different profiles of maltreatment to understand specific vulnerabilities may guide in tailoring interventions to the needs of maltreated children.
高达90%的儿童福利系统案例涉及多种形式的虐待;然而,以往研究很少纳入虐待的多个维度。本研究采用潜在类别分析来识别经历过虐待的儿童的自然亚组。
对117名学龄前寄养儿童的虐待事件报告从两个维度进行分类:类型(如身体虐待、性虐待、身体忽视、监管忽视或情感虐待)和每种类型内的严重程度。
分析揭示了四种不同的类型,显示出中度到高度的虐待情况:(a)监管忽视/情感虐待;(b)性虐待/情感虐待/忽视(未另行说明时,忽视指监管忽视和身体忽视);(c)身体虐待/情感虐待/忽视;以及(d)性虐待/身体虐待/情感虐待/忽视。针对儿童的认知功能以及外化和内化问题对类型归属进行了考察:较低的认知功能与存在忽视或身体虐待(或两者皆有)的类型相关,外化问题在性虐待/身体虐待/情感虐待/忽视类型中最为严重,而内化问题在存在身体或性虐待(或两者皆有)的类型中最为严重。
学龄前儿童中似乎存在不同的虐待类型,这些类型与适应度量存在不同的关联。讨论了政策和实践意义以及未来的研究方向。
利用不同的虐待类型来理解特定的脆弱性,可能有助于根据受虐待儿童的需求定制干预措施。