Russotti Justin, Warmingham Jennifer, Handley Elizabeth D, Manly Jody Todd, Cicchetti Dante
Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester, United States of America.
Columbia University, United States of America.
Child Abuse Negl. 2025 May;163:107400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107400. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Child maltreatment (CM) is a multidimensional construct that requires complex multivariate approaches to properly operationalize the heterogeneity inherent in the exposure. Person-centered approaches, such as Latent Class Analysis (LCA), have emerged as promising methods, with a proliferation of studies in the past decade applying LCA to capture patterns of CM exposure across multiple dimensions. This line of research has been highly generative and also led to disparate findings about the conclusions regarding typical patterning of CM across studies, potentially due to differences in samples, measurements, and indicator selection. Moreover, it is yet unclear whether latent classes are a product of specific samples, or if they can be reproduced across studies that use similar methods.
The current study addresses this gap by replicating a previous LCA of CM exposure using Confirmatory LCA (CLCA)-a first in the literature.
The sample comprises a racially-ethnically diverse cohort of 566 low-income children aged 8-10 (Mean = 9.42, SD = 0.88). Half of the cohort was recruited based on documented histories of CM exposure and the other half contained demographically-matched, nonmaltreated children.
Results provide evidence for the replication of four unique latent classes of CM exposure: a) nonmaltreated, b) Episodic, Single-Type (Neglect), c) Episodic, Single-Type (Abuse), d) Chronic, Multi-Type.
Reproducing latent classes of CM exposure in different samples of CM survivors contributes to the robustness of these specific CM LCAs and serves as an important step toward addressing replication concerns.
儿童虐待(CM)是一个多维度的概念,需要采用复杂的多变量方法来恰当地处理该暴露中固有的异质性。以个体为中心的方法,如潜在类别分析(LCA),已成为很有前景的方法,在过去十年中,大量研究应用LCA来捕捉多个维度上的儿童虐待暴露模式。这一系列研究成果颇丰,但也导致了不同研究在儿童虐待典型模式结论方面存在不同的发现,这可能是由于样本、测量方法和指标选择的差异所致。此外,尚不清楚潜在类别是特定样本的产物,还是可以在使用类似方法的不同研究中重现。
本研究通过使用验证性潜在类别分析(CLCA)复制先前关于儿童虐待暴露的潜在类别分析来填补这一空白,这在文献中尚属首次。
样本包括566名8至10岁的低收入儿童(平均年龄=9.42,标准差=0.88),他们在种族和民族上具有多样性。该队列的一半是根据有记录的儿童虐待暴露史招募的,另一半是人口统计学匹配的未受虐待儿童。
结果为四种独特的儿童虐待暴露潜在类别的复制提供了证据:a)未受虐待,b)偶发性、单一类型(忽视),c)偶发性、单一类型(虐待),d)慢性、多类型。
在不同的儿童虐待幸存者样本中重现儿童虐待暴露的潜在类别有助于增强这些特定的儿童虐待潜在类别分析的稳健性,并朝着解决重复性问题迈出了重要一步。